Hello,
you found a nasty piece in the RTEMS Newlib/GCC configuration. Newlib
provides a crt0.o file which contains a bunch of global symbols suitable
enough to make the GCC link-time configure tests happy. This file must
never be used for a real RTEMS application. The default startfile of GCC
Also if there's any file in covoar directory of coverage-merge branch
that's called symbol-set.c symbol_set_reader.h or any variation of that,
that you don't already have pull all of them into your current branch.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 07:19 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
> Some things are definitely
Some things are definitely missing there. Git checkout main.c
coverage-merge. If you have that branch lying around, that definitely has
everything in it. I must of missed of some things updating to current
master. Fingers crossed this solves our problems
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, 22:52 Vijay Kumar Ban
Cillian.. is he missing a patch?
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 03:19 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> O
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 03:19 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 17 April 2018 at 01:43, Cillian O'Donnell
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 April 2018 at 17:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
O
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 17 April 2018 at 01:43, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 16 April 2018 at 17:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>>> vijaykumar9..
On 17 April 2018 at 01:43, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On 16 April 2018 at 17:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> current status :
>>> the coverage is running now with rtems-test and generating
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Amaan Cheval
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I haven't had much time to continue investigating this specific problem,
> but as I suspected, I've been able to work around it for the time being by
> simply using gcc 7.2.0 with Newlib 2.5.0 with my patch[1] tacked on to it
> (which
Hi!
I haven't had much time to continue investigating this specific problem,
but as I suspected, I've been able to work around it for the time being by
simply using gcc 7.2.0 with Newlib 2.5.0 with my patch[1] tacked on to it
(which seems to have fallen through the cracks - I'd appreciate any inpu
On 16 April 2018 at 17:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> current status :
>> the coverage is running now with rtems-test and generating the report,
>> however, the report doesn't show any data.
>>
>
> I'v
I'm a bit surprised we had this many left. I thought we had
generally come to agreement not to use register and were
slowly removing it anyway. Feel free to commit
Please update the Coding Conventions to include not
using register.
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coding/Conventions
--joel
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> current status :
> the coverage is running now with rtems-test and generating the report,
> however, the report doesn't show any data.
>
I've been lurking as you have been making progress. Now you have cros
current status :
the coverage is running now with rtems-test and generating the report,
however, the report doesn't show any data.
-- vijay
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Yup good idea.
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, 08:23 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> the coverage is running now, shall we start a new mail thread for
> covoar report ?
>
> -- vijay
>
> On 16 April 2018 at 12:35, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>> Ok thanks, so now we need to look into covoar.
>> Do you ha
the coverage is running now, shall we start a new mail thread for
covoar report ?
-- vijay
On 16 April 2018 at 12:35, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> Ok thanks, so now we need to look into covoar.
> Do you have any sample output that will give me an idea of what it should
> look like ?
>
> On Mon
I don't have a screen shot of it. If you firefox report.html and have a
look, all the bits that are NaN and all that will be filled with a
percentage coverage for all symbol sets tested (the only set in
symbol-sets.cfg is score at the moment so the coverage will be the tests
that were run on that s
Ok thanks, so now we need to look into covoar.
Do you have any sample output that will give me an idea of what it should
look like ?
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, 11:13 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
> Probably what'll happen is, when the reports are generating properly,
> Chris will review the changes and co
17 matches
Mail list logo
