Re: Clean up support for automake's silent build option.

On 11/04/2018 16:24, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 11/04/18 08:17, Chris Johns wrote: >> Why do this? It makes it easier to see warnings and issues in a build. > > Oh no. I have no longer an excuse for warnings introduced by me. > Haha, I am in the same boat as you. Chris

[PATCH] build: Add support for automake's silent build support.

--- cpukit/wrapup/Makefile.am | 18 +++--- testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am | 122 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/wrapup/Makefile.am b/cpukit/wrapup/Makefile.am index 3b0887457c..d64e03667a 100644 --- a/cpukit/

Re: Clean up support for automake's silent build option.

On 11/04/18 08:17, Chris Johns wrote: Why do this? It makes it easier to see warnings and issues in a build. Oh no. I have no longer an excuse for warnings introduced by me. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-

Clean up support for automake's silent build option.

Hi, This patch cleans up the build system to support automake's silent build. With automake-1.12.6 the support is only available using automake initialisation option while automake-1.16.1 has command line support. You can view how the output looks here: https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/c

Re: [PATCH] setting raw in get_items

On 11 April 2018 at 10:45, Chris Johns wrote: > On 11/04/2018 15:04, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > I was using Python 3, I just checked that it works fine with Python2.7 > without > > the changes mentioned in the patch. > > I suggest you stay with python 2.7 and do not use python 3. > > Python

Re: [PATCH] setting raw in get_items

On 11/04/2018 15:04, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > I was using Python 3, I just checked that it works fine with Python2.7 without > the changes mentioned in the patch. I suggest you stay with python 2.7 and do not use python 3. Python 3 support is a separate issue and task and while it is importa

Re: [PATCH] setting raw in get_items

I was using Python 3, I just checked that it works fine with Python2.7 without the changes mentioned in the patch. On 11 April 2018 at 06:20, Chris Johns wrote: > On 11/04/2018 07:04, vijaykumar9...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: thelunatic > > > > --- > > rtemstoolkit/configuration.py | 4 ++-- >

Re: [PATCH] initial

yes I'm using python 3 On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 04:49 Chris Johns, wrote: > Hi, > > Are you using Python 3? > > This is an upstream package ... > > https://github.com/msoulier/tftpy/blob/master/tftpy/TftpServer.py > > and it looks to me like this has been fixed upstream so we should pull > down wha

Re: [PATCH] setting raw in get_items

On 11/04/2018 07:04, vijaykumar9...@gmail.com wrote: > From: thelunatic > > --- > rtemstoolkit/configuration.py | 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py b/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py > index 10d97e5..53ad79b 100644 > --- a

Re: [PATCH] initial

Hi, Are you using Python 3? This is an upstream package ... https://github.com/msoulier/tftpy/blob/master/tftpy/TftpServer.py and it looks to me like this has been fixed upstream so we should pull down what is there are update our versions. Chris On 11/04/2018 07:04, vijaykumar9...@gmail.com

Re: CTS coverage running - please review

What patches? On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:04 PM, wrote: > > I managed to get the tests running with the patches . Please review > > ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[PATCH] setting raw in get_items

From: thelunatic --- rtemstoolkit/configuration.py | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py b/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py index 10d97e5..53ad79b 100644 --- a/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py +++ b/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py @@ -98

[PATCH] initial

From: thelunatic --- tester/rt/tftpy/TftpServer.py | 4 ++-- tester/rt/tftpy/TftpStates.py | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/rt/tftpy/TftpServer.py b/tester/rt/tftpy/TftpServer.py index 07c2107..b6d0ada 100644 --- a/tester/rt/tftpy/TftpServer.py +++ b/

[no subject]

I managed to get the tests running with the patches . Please review ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: error while running rtems-test with coverage

You can use this command to send a patch to devel: git send-email LOCATION_OF_PATCH_FILE --to devel@rtems.org --cc=_EMAIL_ID It makes easier to review the patch. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > I managed to get the tests running with the following two patches . >

Re: error while running rtems-test with coverage

I managed to get the tests running with the following two patches . Please review them . -- vijay On 9 April 2018 at 15:28, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, 02:24 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, > wrote: > >> I tried to solve the empty get in the way shown in the patch , but it >> d

Re: (should have been v2 libbsd: Make modules configurable via ini files.)

Am 10.04.2018 um 02:07 schrieb Chris Johns: > On 09/04/2018 23:58, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> Sorry, missed the subject line in git send-email. This description is to >> the v2-patch-set for the libbsd waf changes. >> >> Am 09.04.2018 um 15:53 schrieb Christian Mauderer: >>> Hello, >>> >>> this v