Closes #3349.
---
bsps/i386/pc386/include/edid.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/i386/pc386/include/edid.h b/bsps/i386/pc386/include/edid.h
index 836294d..1653087 100644
--- a/bsps/i386/pc386/include/edid.h
+++ b/bsps/i386/pc386/include/edid.h
@@ -376,8
---
bsps/lm32/lm32_evr/include/bsp.h | 10 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/lm32/lm32_evr/include/bsp.h b/bsps/lm32/lm32_evr/include/bsp.h
index 7c3ac84..4f6c9ee 100644
--- a/bsps/lm32/lm32_evr/include/bsp.h
+++ b/bsps/lm32/lm32_evr/include/bsp.h
@@ -39
---
bsps/powerpc/mvme5500/include/bsp/VMEConfig.h | 30 +--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/mvme5500/include/bsp/VMEConfig.h
b/bsps/powerpc/mvme5500/include/bsp/VMEConfig.h
index ecc5789..a5b43df 100644
--- a/bsps/powerpc/mvme55
---
bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-a8core-start.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-a8core-start.h
b/bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-a8core-start.h
index 416f282..08311b4 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/include/bsp/arm-a8core-start.h
+++ b/bsps/arm/include/
Closes #3348.
---
bsps/powerpc/beatnik/include/bsp.h | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/beatnik/include/bsp.h
b/bsps/powerpc/beatnik/include/bsp.h
index e980f1a..2ed827e 100644
--- a/bsps/powerpc/beatnik/include/bsp.h
+++ b/bsps/powerpc/beatni
Closes #3346.
---
cpukit/score/cpu/bfin/include/rtems/bfin/bf533.h | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/bfin/include/rtems/bfin/bf533.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/bfin/include/rtems/bfin/bf533.h
index 682aad4..2b2f97c 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/cpu/bfin/include/rte
Closes #3345.
---
bsps/powerpc/mvme3100/include/bsp.h | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/mvme3100/include/bsp.h
b/bsps/powerpc/mvme3100/include/bsp.h
index 3fbfcb3..d078d08 100644
--- a/bsps/powerpc/mvme3100/include/bsp.h
+++ b/bsps/power
---
bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h b/bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h
index 798fa95..8811d5a 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h
+++ b/bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h
@@ -47,11 +47,
Closes #3344.
---
bsps/m68k/include/mcf5272/mcf5272.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/m68k/include/mcf5272/mcf5272.h
b/bsps/m68k/include/mcf5272/mcf5272.h
index 37dae92..c1b5948 100644
--- a/bsps/m68k/include/mcf5272/mcf5272.h
+++ b/bsps/m68k/include
---
bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h b/bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h
index 8811d5a..eaa06fc 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h
+++ b/bsps/arm/gdbarmsim/include/bsp.h
@@ -57,9 +5
---
bsps/m68k/mcf5206elite/include/ds1307.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bsps/m68k/mcf5206elite/include/ds1307.h
b/bsps/m68k/mcf5206elite/include/ds1307.h
index 8e5636a..ee7993c 100644
--- a/bsps/m68k/mcf5206elite/include/ds1307.h
+++ b/bsps/m68k/mcf5206elit
---
bsps/sh/gensh1/include/bsp.h | 13 -
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/sh/gensh1/include/bsp.h b/bsps/sh/gensh1/include/bsp.h
index 2c0da4b..f3f7c02 100644
--- a/bsps/sh/gensh1/include/bsp.h
+++ b/bsps/sh/gensh1/include/bsp.h
@@ -56,19 +56,6 @@ extern void *CPU_Int
Hi
You likely noticed the flurry of tickets for warnings. If I
assigned one to you please fix it. I am fixing most of them.
This is patch series makes a dent in the warnings and
closes some tickets I filed.
--joel
Joel Sherrill (12):
mcf5206elite/include/ds1307.h: Fix extra tokens at end of
I doubt everyone will see this so am passing along.
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Malcolm
Date: Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM
Subject: Blog post about gcc 8 usability improvements
To: g...@gcc.gnu.org
Sorry for the shameless self-promotion, but I've written up the work
I'v
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Udit agarwal wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>>
>> On 15/03/18 09:20, Udit agarwal wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, will it be ok to keep atsam_trng_mutex even after user has finished
>>> using getentropy() i.e when we don't use destroy(
On 15 March 2018 at 12:26, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> It runs with a bunch of errors . I have attached the log file
>
Ok, I'm guessing you didn't set up Couverture-Qemu (special version of qemu
designed for generating extra trace data for coverage analysis). That's
what those errors are about
It runs with a bunch of errors . I have attached the log file
-- vijay
On 15 March 2018 at 16:58, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> Looks good. If you run the samples without coverage is everything ok?
>
> So removing --coverage and tacking on /samples
>
> $HOME/development/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-t
Looks good. If you run the samples without coverage is everything ok?
So removing --coverage and tacking on /samples
$HOME/development/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-test --rtems-bsp=leon3-qemu
--log=log-leon3.log --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5
--rtems-builddir=$HOME/development/rtems/kernel/l
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 15/03/18 09:20, Udit agarwal wrote:
>
>> Also, will it be ok to keep atsam_trng_mutex even after user has finished
>> using getentropy() i.e when we don't use destroy(&atsam_trng_mutex) at all?
>>
>
I have attached the output of the ls of that directory
-- vijay
On 15 March 2018 at 15:52, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On 15 March 2018 at 03:58, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>>
>> hello ,
>>
>> as told by Joel , I started this thread to further discuss the coverage
>> analysis toolset .
On 15 March 2018 at 03:58, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
> hello ,
>
> as told by Joel , I started this thread to further discuss the coverage
> analysis toolset .
>
> Current status is , I'm trying to builld and run rtems-test from the
> coverage-merge branch of the previous GSoC student Cillian
Alright so last time we looked at this the major issues were:
Covoars reliance on external tools that would cause portability issues.
Those were nm (which I got rid of but the fix is still only on my github,
I'll submit the patch when everything's rebased with current rtems-tools
master and I can
On 15/03/18 09:20, Udit agarwal wrote:
Also, will it be ok to keep atsam_trng_mutex even after user has
finished using getentropy() i.e when we don't use
destroy(&atsam_trng_mutex) at all?
Why do you want to destroy the mutex?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 15/03/18 08:13, Udit agarwal wrote:
>
>> Oh yes, i think i misinterpreted your previous suggestion of surrounding
>> the while loop by mutex, it should be the outer while loop. some thing like
>> thi
---
rtemsbsd/sys/dev/atsam/if_atsam.c | 52 +--
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtemsbsd/sys/dev/atsam/if_atsam.c
b/rtemsbsd/sys/dev/atsam/if_atsam.c
index 794937be..86e232ab 100644
--- a/rtemsbsd/sys/dev/atsam/if_atsam.c
+++ b/rt
On 15/03/18 08:13, Udit agarwal wrote:
Oh yes, i think i misinterpreted your previous suggestion of
surrounding the while loop by mutex, it should be the outer while
loop. some thing like this?:
while (n > 0) {
uint32_t random;
size_t copy;
rtems_mutex_lock(&atsam_trng_
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/03/18 05:56, Udit agarwal wrote:
>
>> +/* TRNG Register */
>> +
>> +/* RNG base address */
>>
>
> Is the module name TRNG or RNG?
>
It's TRNG. I'll correct this.
>
> +#define RNG_BASE 0x4831
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/03/18 05:56, Udit agarwal wrote:
>
>> c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/atsam/startup/getentropy-trng.c | 6 ++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/atsam/startu
28 matches
Mail list logo