Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

On 09/02/18 13:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 09/02/18 08:58, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 08/02/18 16:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: sp19 and tm26 are not in that list. What about them? They should be fixed now. The sp19 fails now on SPARC: *** BEGIN OF TEST SP 19 *** *** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.dc8

Re: RFC: Remove score/cpu/.../types.h

On 07/03/18 20:06, Joel Sherrill wrote: The discussion over adding paravirt.h and tinkering at that level made me realize that the score/cpu/.../types.h files are very small. They only have the CPU_Uint32ptr type plus sometimes some odd things like blackfin_isr_entry (unused). If CPU_Uint32ptr i

[PATCH] c-user: Simplify clustered scheduler configuration

Close #3325. --- c-user/configuring_a_system.rst | 71 + 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst b/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst index 58b381c..c335eaf 100644 --- a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst +++

[PATCH 1/2] config: Simplify clustered scheduler configuration

Do not use names derived from scheduler implementation details. Instead use names derived from the scheduler configuration or documentation. Provide defines for backward compatibility. Update #3325. --- cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs.h | 151 +-- cpukit/inclu

[PATCH 2/2] config: Use new scheduler configuration defines

Update #3325. --- cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs.h | 36 testsuites/smptests/smpclock01/init.c | 12 +-- testsuites/smptests/smpfatal04/init.c | 4 +- testsuites/smptests/smpfatal05/init.c | 8 +- testsuites/smptests/smpfatal08/init.c | 8 +- tes

[PATCH] (master) Add etag callback to mghttp

Hi, This is the patch for master, the other patch is for the 4.11 branch (with the correct ticket number. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[PATCH] cpukit/mttpd: Add a callback to generate a per file HTTP etag.

Closes #3323 --- cpukit/include/mghttpd/mongoose.h | 13 + cpukit/mghttpd/mongoose.c | 19 +-- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/mghttpd/mongoose.h b/cpukit/include/mghttpd/mongoose.h index 330ed6701b..f975dfb66f 100

[PATCH] cpukit/mttpd: Add a callback to generate a per file HTTP etag.

Closes #3323 --- cpukit/mghttpd/mongoose.c | 19 +-- cpukit/mghttpd/mongoose.h | 13 + 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/mghttpd/mongoose.c b/cpukit/mghttpd/mongoose.c index dd243d3320..911ca64767 100644 --- a/cpukit/mghttpd/mongoose

[PATCH 1/3] powerpc/include/rtems/score/types.h: Remove unused ppc_isr

--- cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/include/rtems/score/types.h | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/include/rtems/score/types.h b/cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/include/rtems/score/types.h index cdab302..38f7a9d 100644 --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/include/rtems/scor

[PATCH 3/3] cpukit/include/mqueue.h: Delete unneeded includes

--- cpukit/include/mqueue.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/mqueue.h b/cpukit/include/mqueue.h index 36733a4..4441629 100644 --- a/cpukit/include/mqueue.h +++ b/cpukit/include/mqueue.h @@ -37,9 +37,6 @@ #include -#include -#include - /** * @defgroup

[PATCH 2/3] score/cpu/powerpc/include/rtems/score/powerpc.h: Fix typo

--- cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/include/rtems/score/powerpc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/include/rtems/score/powerpc.h b/cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/include/rtems/score/powerpc.h index 88ee002..2cd82ea 100644 --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/power

RFC: Remove score/cpu/.../types.h

Hi The discussion over adding paravirt.h and tinkering at that level made me realize that the score/cpu/.../types.h files are very small. They only have the CPU_Uint32ptr type plus sometimes some odd things like blackfin_isr_entry (unused). If CPU_Uint32ptr is moved to cpu.h, then the other conte

Re: getentropy() implementation on BBB

Hello Udit, let me start with a hint: It's quite normal that the first patches of a contributor get a lot of attention and have a lot of revisions. That can be quite annoying for the one who writes the patch. But please understand it in the way it's thought: As suggestions for improvement. Did yo

Re: Uniprocessor vs. Uni-Processor

It is uniprocessor. On Mar 7, 2018 7:04 AM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > in the documentation we have currently both variants. I think we should > use only one. Which one? > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-

Uniprocessor vs. Uni-Processor

Hello, in the documentation we have currently both variants. I think we should use only one. Which one? -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-br

Re: getentropy() implementation on BBB

Thanks, I just came across ticket #3053 , which talks about changing RTEMS license from GNU GPL to BSD-2-Clause (i was initially unaware of this!). I'll make the required changes. Regards, Udit agarwal On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Sebastian Huber < sebasti

Re: getentropy() implementation on BBB

On 07/03/18 11:26, Udit agarwal wrote: > +/* > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Udit kumar agarwal > > + * > + * The license and distribution terms for this file may be > + * found in the file LICENSE in this distribution or at > + * http://www.rtems.org/license/LICENSE

Re: getentropy() implementation on BBB

Hi, I have updated the code, please have a look. >From 74b8f4f5b9dd929b71ed5fb9dd0bc721a6f27a28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Udit agarwal Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:52:13 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Added getentropy support to beagle BSP --- bsps/arm/include/libcpu/am335x.h | 34 +++