On 07/11/17 01:56, Chris Johns wrote:
On 06/11/2017 22:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
This makes it easier to find the documentation for a given configuration
option.
Can you please generate the HTML and PDF so we can review what this looks like?
You can review it here:
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub
On 07/11/17 06:46, Chris Johns wrote:
+/**
+ * @brief Returns the version's VC ident. This is specific to the VC being
+ * used.
+ *
+ * @retval int The version's VC ident.
+ */
+const char *rtems_version_vc_ident( void );
Normally, we don't have abbreviations in the RTEMS API functions. What
On 07/11/17 08:24, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 07/11/17 08:15, Chris Johns wrote:
On 07/11/2017 17:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Commit: 7b00c2fac57740963d3c4d8bf1cf5eab3a31f22e
- rtems_test_begin();
+ TEST_BEGIN();
- rtems_test_end();
+ TEST_END();
I am now confused
$ arm-rtems4.12-nm
On 07/11/17 08:15, Chris Johns wrote:
On 07/11/2017 17:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Commit:7b00c2fac57740963d3c4d8bf1cf5eab3a31f22e
- rtems_test_begin();
+ TEST_BEGIN();
- rtems_test_end();
+ TEST_END();
I am now confused
$ arm-rtems4.12-nm `find . -name \*.exe` | grep rtems_test_be
On 07/11/2017 17:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Commit:7b00c2fac57740963d3c4d8bf1cf5eab3a31f22e
> - rtems_test_begin();
> + TEST_BEGIN();
> - rtems_test_end();
> + TEST_END();
I am now confused
$ arm-rtems4.12-nm `find . -name \*.exe` | grep rtems_test_begin
001118dc T rtems_test_begin
On 06/11/17 23:03, Chris Johns wrote:
On 06/11/2017 21:20, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 27/10/17 07:13, Chris Johns wrote:
On 26/10/2017 18:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
with the change to the INI format files, the
target_pretest_command
target_exe_filter_command
disappeared.
Oh I changed some
In canonical mode, input is made available line by line. We must stop
the canonical buffer filling upon reception of an end-of-line character.
Close #3218.
---
cpukit/libcsupport/src/termios.c | 6 ++-
testsuites/libtests/termios09/init.c | 97
2 files c
On 07/11/2017 08:49, Chris Johns wrote:
>> Why can't we use a Git post-checkout hook (attached)?
>
> I tend to get a little uneasy when a VC tool is touching code in a project
> underneath another operation. It makes auditing more complicated. If you think
> the autoconf change is still not suitab
Provide functions to get the version string, major, minor and revision
numbers and the version control identifer that is a unique tag for
the version control system.
Update #3199.
---
cpukit/sapi/Makefile.am| 35 +++-
cpukit/sapi/include/rtems/version.h
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 06/11/2017 22:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > This makes it easier to find the documentation for a given configuration
> > option.
>
> Can you please generate the HTML and PDF so we can review what this looks
> like?
>
> I have figured out in
On 06/11/2017 22:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> This makes it easier to find the documentation for a given configuration
> option.
Can you please generate the HTML and PDF so we can review what this looks like?
I have figured out indexes and I will sweep over the docs adding them soon. The
CONFIGUR
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've come across this page [1], but it hasn't been updated since 2011.
> I'm wondering what's the status of Clang project and how feasible it's
> to build RTEMS with it.
>
That page is status from my attempt to compile RTEMS with c
Hi,
I've come across this page [1], but it hasn't been updated since 2011.
I'm wondering what's the status of Clang project and how feasible it's
to build RTEMS with it.
[1] https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Projects/CLANG
Cheers,
--
Hesham
___
devel maili
On 06/11/2017 21:20, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 27/10/17 07:13, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 26/10/2017 18:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> with the change to the INI format files, the
>>>
>>> target_pretest_command
>>> target_exe_filter_command
>>>
>>> disappeared.
>> Oh I changed some names as part of
On 06/11/2017 17:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>> Do all tests call the begin function in libmisc?
>
> Yes, I hope that this is the case.
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/support/include/buffer_test_io.h#n65
is not doing that. This needs to change.
> Some tests use rtems_test_begin()
On 06/11/2017 17:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> How reliable is this Autoconf stuff?
Haha, that is a leading question! I suppose it depends on how you use it or
abuse it as we have in our case.
> Do I have to re-build everything after each
> Git checkout (cpuopts.h is included in nearly every head
Close #3170.
Update #3199.
---
c-user/configuring_a_system.rst | 38 ++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst b/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst
index 0d4ebd7..2890a95 100644
--- a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst
+++ b/c-u
This makes it easier to find the documentation for a given configuration
option.
Remove superfluous comments.
---
c-user/configuring_a_system.rst | 1120 ++-
1 file changed, 396 insertions(+), 724 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst b/c-u
---
.../include/rtems/score/schedulerpriorityaffinitysmp.h | 4 ++--
cpukit/score/src/schedulerpriorityaffinitysmp.c | 16 +---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/schedulerpriorityaffinitysmp.h
b/cpukit/score/in
Update #3059.
---
cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/scheduler.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/scheduler.h
b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/scheduler.h
index 38f3e710e7..669f82c48c 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/scheduler.h
+
Change the chain order relation to use a directly specified left hand
side value. This is similar to _RBTree_Insert_inline() and helps the
compiler to better optimize the code.
---
cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/chainimpl.h | 27 ++
.../include/rtems/score/schedulerprioritysmpimpl
On 27/10/17 07:13, Chris Johns wrote:
On 26/10/2017 18:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
with the change to the INI format files, the
target_pretest_command
target_exe_filter_command
disappeared.
Oh I changed some names as part of a clean up.
I am not sure how I can invoke the tester for a board u
On 26/10/17 08:22, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Please review this patch carefully. It adds a new chapter "ARM Board
Support Packages" following the "ARM Specific Information" chapter. It
adds a template structure for other BSPs.
Where should we place common BSP configuration options like
BSP_PRESS
23 matches
Mail list logo
