Hello,
we have currently some pre-processor magic to map the standard output functions
to the RTEMS test printer. This works only if you include in every
test file in the right spot. An alternative would be to use a separate library
for all tests, e.g. librtemstest.a which provides puts(), pri
On 28/10/17 7:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Can I go ahead? There is a lot more to do to get good test results without a
> console driver.
Yes. Sorry I did not directly say that.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mai
Hello Chris,
Can I go ahead? There is a lot more to do to get good test results without a
console driver.
- Chris Johns schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series looks good and thank you for making move. I had planned on
> moving to this point once I knew printk change gave me suitable test res
