Hello Joel,
On Friday 14 of October 2016 00:56:21 Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Jakob Viketoft <
> >
> > jakob.viket...@aacmicrotec.com> wrote:
> >> *From:* Joel Sherrill [j...@rtems.org]
> >> *Sent:* Thursday, O
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Jakob Viketoft <
> jakob.viket...@aacmicrotec.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> *From:* Joel Sherrill [j...@rtems.org]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2016 17:38
>> *To:* Jakob Viketoft
>> *Cc:* devel@rtems.org
>> *S
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Jakob Viketoft <
jakob.viket...@aacmicrotec.com> wrote:
>
> *From:* Joel Sherrill [j...@rtems.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2016 17:38
> *To:* Jakob Viketoft
> *Cc:* devel@rtems.org
> *Subject:* Re: Time spent in ticks...
>
> >I don't have an or1k handy so
Hello Jakob,
On Thursday 13 of October 2016 18:21:05 Jakob Viketoft wrote:
> I re-tested my case using an -O3 optimization (we have been using -O0
> during development for debugging purposes) and I got a good performance
> boost, but I'm still nowhere near your numbers. I can vouch for that the
>
From: Joel Sherrill [j...@rtems.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 17:38
To: Jakob Viketoft
Cc: devel@rtems.org
Subject: Re: Time spent in ticks...
>I don't have an or1k handy so ran on a sparc/erc32 simulator/
>It is is a SPARC v7 at 15 Mhz.
>These times are in microseconds and based on the
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jakob Viketoft <
jakob.viket...@aacmicrotec.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We're running on an or1k-based BSP off of 4.11 (with the patches I've
> forwarded in February last year) and have seen some strange sluggishness in
> the system. When measuring using a st
Some typo corrections of e-mail written when I have returned
late in night from meeting with friends.
And some more clarification as well.
On Thursday 13 of October 2016 01:55:30 Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> On Wednesday 12 of October 2016 23:05:30 Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 13/10/2016 03:
Hello everyone,
We're running on an or1k-based BSP off of 4.11 (with the patches I've forwarded
in February last year) and have seen some strange sluggishness in the system.
When measuring using a standalone peripheral clock, I can see that we spend
between 0.8 - 1.4 ms just handling the tick.
