Re: libbsd: Argument list too long

On 13/06/16 09:25, Sebastian Huber wrote: I created a waf ticket for this: https://github.com/waf-project/waf/issues/1756 There exists a workaround for this problem. Should we add the "waf" script equipped with this workaround to the libbsd? -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address

Re: [PATCH 2/2] posix: add clock_nanosleep and tests

The wait by absolute time is currently not supported via _Thread_queue_Enqueue_critical(), e.g. absolute time adjustments have no effect. All the timed POSIX services are affected by this shortcoming. On 09/06/16 17:56, Gedare Bloom wrote: closes #2732 Thus, I would only update the ticket.

Re: [PATCH] Move gcc-version to gcc-6-20160609 for rtems-4.12 to fix gnat

Thanks, I slightly modified the patch and checked it in. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request.

Re: libbsd: Argument list too long

I created a waf ticket for this: https://github.com/waf-project/waf/issues/1756 On 10/06/16 18:20, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Jun 10, 2016 9:16 AM, "Sebastian Huber" > wrote: > > Hello, > > I added the NFSv3 client to libbsd which has now 884 files fo