On 06/06/2016 19:57, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 04/06/16 08:16, Chris Johns wrote:
On 03/06/2016 23:44, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 03/06/16 15:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
My concern is that this will break existing programs that used them for
condition synchronization.
These applications are brok
Hi Pavel,
This information is quite helpful. Thank you!
Isaac
On 06/06/2016 04:36 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Isaac,
On Thursday 02 of June 2016 17:09:31 Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 06/01/2016 07:18 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Isaac,
On Wednesday 01 of June 2016 23:09:39 Isaac Gutekunst wrote
Hello Sebastian,
On Monday 06 of June 2016 13:12:52 Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > But if the RTEMS API is getting touched then in this regard I rise
> > again my opinion that semaphores and mutexes should be strictly
> > separated. This would prevent confusion and help to static code analyze
> >
Remove superfluous includes. Use one attribute compare for each
semaphore variant. Text size drops by 10% on PowerPC due to this.
---
cpukit/rtems/src/semcreate.c | 240 +++
1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/rtems/src
Hello Pavel,
On 04/06/16 11:57, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Sebastian and others,
generally, I am highly thankfull for all that hard work done to bring
RTEMS to multicore SoC era and all that with attempt to keep RTEMS
API compatible with existing applications.
On Friday 03 of June 2016 15:26:15 S
Hello Deval,
On Thursday 02 of June 2016 10:49:34 Deval Shah wrote:
> Hello Pavel,
>
> I would like to work on this problem. Can I get some more details and some
> literature to go through ?
it would be great. I think that I have complete knowledge to
do that in somethink like one or two days but
On 04/06/16 08:16, Chris Johns wrote:
On 03/06/2016 23:44, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 03/06/16 15:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
My concern is that this will break existing programs that used them for
condition synchronization.
These applications are broken since you can obtain the
RTEMS_BINARY_SE
On 06/06/16 10:36, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Isaac,
On Thursday 02 of June 2016 17:09:31 Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 06/01/2016 07:18 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Isaac,
On Wednesday 01 of June 2016 23:09:39 Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
I believe I solved all my problems. Not enough memory. After upd
Hello Isaac,
On Thursday 02 of June 2016 17:09:31 Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 07:18 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> > Hello Isaac,
> >
> > On Wednesday 01 of June 2016 23:09:39 Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
> >> I believe I solved all my problems. Not enough memory. After updating
> >> the linker scri
