On 14/03/2016 09:33, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Chris and others,
On Sunday 13 of March 2016 22:28:14 Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/03/2016 1:53 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
If this works for you, and you are sufficiently interested, it would
be useful to provide CMake example for the examples-v2.git repos
Hello Chris and others,
On Sunday 13 of March 2016 22:28:14 Chris Johns wrote:
> On 13/03/2016 1:53 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > If this works for you, and you are sufficiently interested, it would
> > be useful to provide CMake example for the examples-v2.git repository
> > for others to benefit.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 13/03/2016 1:53 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> If this works for you, and you are sufficiently interested, it would
>> be useful to provide CMake example for the examples-v2.git repository
>> for others to benefit.
>
> I am not sure about adding
On 13/03/2016 1:53 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> If this works for you, and you are sufficiently interested, it would
> be useful to provide CMake example for the examples-v2.git repository
> for others to benefit.
I am not sure about adding this to examples-v2.git. I would prefer it to
be a waf only
Hi Joel,
>> >> >
>> >> > I am interested in working on x86_64 BSP as GSOC2016 project with
>> >> > RTEMS and with initial guidance from Joel as to how to get started, I
>> >> > am working on the same.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Great! This is a nice project we need.
>> >
>
> Work on your proposal so we can f
cmake works fine if the variables are over-ridden. And things aren't that
difficult while using pc386 bsp.
But if we are dealing with arm or other archs, the best way ( and the
recommended one ) to do during cross-compiling would be to create a
toolchain file, forcing cmake to use the cross compili
Note: the RTEMS_TOOLS and BSP_DIR variables in the above mail point to the
toolchain directory and BSP directory respectively and need to be passed to
cmake while calling it using the ( -D ) flag.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Sujay Raj wrote:
> cmake works fine if the variables are over-ridd
On 03/10, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Joel might answer about the state of the scheduling simulator.
@Joel, any thoughts / inputs on the state of the scheduling simulator
would be very helpful. I'm currently trying to come up with a draft
timeline for review, but this is a blocking factor. I've cloned
