Re: general comments on sysiinit patches

2016-02-01 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 29/01/16 07:28, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 28/01/16 03:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > >On 27/01/16 15:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >>On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Sebastian Huber >>>>

GSoC 2016

2016-02-01 Thread Viktoriya Vasiliev
Hi, My name is Viktoriya Vasiliev, I study mechanical engineering at the Moscow State University of Mechanical Engineering. I will like to participate in the Google Summer of Code 2016 with RTEMS because of my interest of Operating Systems. I will like to know what I should be doing in preparation

Re: Planned SMP Improvements

2016-02-01 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Darshit Shah wrote: > On 27 January 2016 at 10:54, Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> Maybe we can implement >> >> Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support >> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2510 >> >> as part of this years GSoC. >> > I've alread

Re: Planned SMP Improvements

2016-02-01 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 01/02/16 14:39, Darshit Shah wrote: >Maybe we can implement > >Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support >https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2510 > >as part of this years GSoC. > I've already mentioned that I'd be interested in picking this up as a potential project. How

ANN: New class "RTEMS Application Development" in Munich/Germany, 12.-14. April 2016

2016-02-01 Thread Thomas Doerfler
Hello, we are currently planning an open RTEMS class "RTEMS Application Development" in Munich/Germany to start on April 12th, 2016. This class has is main focus on application development based on the RTEMS kernel. Maybe you or some of your colleagues like to join in? See our u

Re: Planned SMP Improvements

2016-02-01 Thread Darshit Shah
On 27 January 2016 at 10:54, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > I added three tickets that will lead to a major improvement of the SMP > capabilities of RTEMS in case we are able to implement them: > > New watchdog handler implementation > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2554 > > Eliminate the Gia