Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpukit/task{set,get}note.c: Remove obsolete Notepads

2015-12-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Dec 21, 2015 1:07 PM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Do we want to remove the task note functions so that an application gets compiler and linker errors or warnings? Or do we make the functions empty and return an error status code? These were really bad APIs

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpukit/task{set,get}note.c: Remove obsolete Notepads

2015-12-21 Thread Sebastian Huber
Do we want to remove the task note functions so that an application gets compiler and linker errors or warnings? Or do we make the functions empty and return an error status code? - Am 21. Dez 2015 um 19:32 schrieb Joel Sherrill j...@rtems.org: > To remove notepads fully, the documentation

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpukit/task{set,get}note.c: Remove obsolete Notepads

2015-12-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
To remove notepads fully, the documentation and testsuites should also be touched. There should be more in the patch. --joel On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 21/12/15 02:13, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote: > >> updates #2493. >> --- >> cpu

Re: RTEMS User Level Tracing?

2015-12-21 Thread Isaac Gutekunst
On 12/20/2015 08:02 PM, Chris Johns wrote: On 19/12/2015 6:36 AM, isaac.gutekunst wrote: We're interested in trace some application data in our RTEMS project. Here's a bunch of background and thoughts: I've read the following pages: * https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Tracing