Re: Resolution of Ticket #1709.

I updated the ticket. If anyone cares, it should be fixed in 4.9 and 4.10 as well. On 16/12/15 02:01, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote: Ticket #1709 addresses a potential invalid pointer validity test. The pointer validity comes from an faulty conditional test that could allow 'NULL' values to pass through

Re: [PATCH 0/6] rtems-source-builder patche series for graphic libraries

On 12/04/15 14:08, Chris Johns wrote: I will. I am just sorting out the release things in the RSB first. I expect these changes to not break these patches but I want to get the release working. I have pushed these patches. Do we need build set files for 4.12 on master? Should I push the chang

Resolution of Ticket #1709.

Ticket #1709 addresses a potential invalid pointer validity test. The pointer validity comes from an faulty conditional test that could allow 'NULL' values to pass through, resulting in a null pointer to a file descriptor causing long-term issues. The patch for this issue was proposed 5 years ago

[PATCH] Beaglebone Black: Fix rtems_gpio_bsp_disable_interrupt disabling all the GPIO interrupts

Currently, rtems_gpio_bsp_disable_interrupt disables the interrupts for all the pins, not just the one that actually caused the interrupt. This patch fixes that issue. Closes #2497. --- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/beagle/gpio/bbb-gpio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a

Re: Question about newlib networking

On 15/12/15 13:19, Daniel Gutson wrote: Hi folks, I'm confused about the latest patches: does newlib contain a (full) network stack which we don't use? Newlib contains nothing network related. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany

Re: [PATCH] libnetworking/gethostbyht.c: Bugfix for hostf validity test

He is fighting the spam filter. Amar is working on it On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Aun-Ali, > > On 15/12/15 01:22, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote: >> >> I still can't do that due to >> my inability to post to Trac. > > > what is the problem with the Trac access for you? >

Question about newlib networking

Hi folks, I'm confused about the latest patches: does newlib contain a (full) network stack which we don't use? Thanks, Daniel. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH] libnetworking/gethostbyht.c: Bugfix for hostf validity test

Hello Aun-Ali, On 15/12/15 01:22, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote: I still can't do that due to my inability to post to Trac. what is the problem with the Trac access for you? -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax

Re: Google Code In (GCI) starting in 2 days

On 14/12/15 16:57, Gedare Bloom wrote: Yes, removing notepads and removing task variables are good tasks. They'll need a little more write-up yet, although we can start by opening up two tasks to "investigate/fix" the tickets and see what students do with it. I will add them soon. I updated t

Re: [PATCH] Chase Newlib sys/select.h changes

Hello Nick, I checked in the shell changes separately. With them I can build the latest Newlib with --disable-networking. It should be sufficient to remove the from libnetworking. On 14/12/15 10:09, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello Nick, this patch needs an update once this is committed to New