[PATCH] Delete unused declarations and define

--- cpukit/libcsupport/include/rtems/libcsupport.h | 6 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libcsupport/include/rtems/libcsupport.h b/cpukit/libcsupport/include/rtems/libcsupport.h index 16754c5..1e16551 100644 --- a/cpukit/libcsupport/include/rtems/libcsupp

Re: [PATCH] Require __getreent()

On 25/11/15 15:32, Marcos Díaz wrote: Hi Sebastian we are using newlib-2.1.0, what we want to know is why is this change necessary now, why it was as before. Thanks! In this Newlib version the patch is included. However, its not a good idea to use an arbitrary Newlib version with the RTEMS ma

Re: [PATCH] Require __getreent()

Hi Sebastian we are using newlib-2.1.0, what we want to know is why is this change necessary now, why it was as before. Thanks! On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 25/11/15 14:30, Daniel Gutson wrote: > >> How does the lack of th

Re: [PATCH] Require __getreent()

On 25/11/15 14:30, Daniel Gutson wrote: How does the lack of this function affect current RTEMS behavior? Its necessary for proper interaction with Newlib. What's the impact of not having this? We lived without this till now, how mandatory is this update? I doubt, that you didn't use this

Re: [PATCH] Require __getreent()

Hi Sebastian, sorry for top-posting. How does the lack of this function affect current RTEMS behavior? What's the impact of not having this? We lived without this till now, how mandatory is this update? Thanks! Daniel. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > This functio

[PATCH] Delete empty libc_init()

--- .../lib/libbsp/powerpc/beatnik/startup/bspstart.c | 2 - c/src/lib/libbsp/shared/bsplibc.c | 5 --- cpukit/libcsupport/Makefile.am | 2 +- cpukit/libcsupport/include/rtems/libcsupport.h | 1 - cpukit/libcsupport/src/newlibc_init.c | 45