I think there should be a requirement that you can deploy an RTEMS release at a
site strictly using Makefiles. Not develop RTEMS or build RTEMS, but deploy
RTEMS.
I would prefer, but won’t go so far as to say it is a requirement, that one
should be able rebuild a deployed BSP with changes via
The fixed size 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit integer types are optional too.
I don't think this is a compiler issue. Some architectures may have problems
to support such types.
- Am 26. Sep 2015 um 21:30 schrieb Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com:
> Hi
>
> I was doing some invest
Hi
I was doing some investigation this week and noticed that both these types are
optional in C99 and POSIX. We know gcc and llvm have them and checked on two
(non Microsoft) closed source compilers. All supported it.
I had always taken then for granted as part of C99. I think they are
univers
Hello Gedare,
this part of the compare exchange operation is not used in 4.11. There are a
couple of other issues with the low level SMP code that turned up after a
review and this is a preparation patch.
- Am 25. Sep 2015 um 22:38 schrieb Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org:
> Sebastian,
> Doe
On September 26, 2015 9:52:37 AM CDT, "Thomas Dörfler"
wrote:
>Peter's statement gets a +1 for me. Makefile integration IMHO makes
>using RTEMS in many development systems rather easy. Forcing Waf for
>user development is a drawback.
>
>
>How can we avoid this?
>
There are two pieces here.
+
Peter's statement gets a +1 for me. Makefile integration IMHO makes using RTEMS
in many development systems rather easy. Forcing Waf for user development is a
drawback.
How can we avoid this?
Wkr Thomas.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Peter Dufault
Datum:
An: Gedare Bloom
I don’t like this requirement. I think it’s fine for development but want to
be able to deliver a package that will integrate into a client’s Makefile based
build system where they can make changes and re-build. In other words, I don’t
mind if building a BSP or updating RTEMS requires waf, but
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Isaac Gutekunst
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is the RTEMS CAN driver framework I've been talking about. Please give
> me feedback, and don't worry about being harsh. I want to commit something
> of value.
>
I found some time this morning, and took a look at the versio
The comment below, made in the users ml, caught me off guard. How will
user's applications build when RTEMS is built with Waf?
If there is a complex answer, then this conversation belongs here on
the devel ml until we can sort it out.
Gedare
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>
