This patch adds a brief description of how context state is saved into the
SP on exception entry, and makes a few changes to _ARMV7M_Exception_default
in order to make it a bit more efficient. I also removed the unused 'v7mfsz'
input parameter.
This should apply over Sudarshan's patch.
---
cpukit
On September 18, 2015 2:30:02 PM CDT, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Isaac Gutekunst
>> wrote:
>>> We will send in a patch at some point.
>>>
>>> The BSPs are two new BSP based off the existing STM32F4 BSP. The
>mot
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Isaac Gutekunst
> wrote:
>> We will send in a patch at some point.
>>
>> The BSPs are two new BSP based off the existing STM32F4 BSP. The motivation
>> is to keep the old BSP that includes only RTEMS contribut
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Isaac Gutekunst
wrote:
> We will send in a patch at some point.
>
> The BSPs are two new BSP based off the existing STM32F4 BSP. The motivation
> is to keep the old BSP that includes only RTEMS contributed code. The new
> BSP includes lots of 3rd party ST code to m
By the way we flashed the eMMC with the u-boot image. Follow the guide to
know how to do so.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Marcos Díaz <
marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
> Well, after talking with the guys of beagleboard, they made me update the
> u-boot version.
>
> With that I cou
Well, after talking with the guys of beagleboard, they made me update the
u-boot version.
With that I could make the cache and ethernet work Ok in Rev A5C !!!.
So, Ragu, if you can update your BBB's u-boot, try again using RTEMS with
LWIP and cache enabled, and test it.
Download it from here:
ht
On 2015-09-18 00:10, Chris Johns wrote:
On 18/09/2015 11:01 am, Ian Caddy wrote:
We use 4.10 and add our application shell commands programmatically.
For
example:
rtems_shell_add_cmd("findnb", "nameblock", "findnb# list
nameblocks", main_findnb);
I do the same thing on 4.11.
Chri
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> there was a discussion about this on this mailing list. I think the result
> was that GCC is working as intended:
>
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-July/011879.html
Yes. Semantic is changed but after the di
On 17/09/15 16:36, Aurelio Remonda wrote:
It is printing the "real time" but the time is set to a date early
>in the RTEMS development history. Look at the year. That's about the
>time the test was initially written.
>
>It is likely running faster than "real time" because it is a simulator.
>Th
Hello Daniel,
there was a discussion about this on this mailing list. I think the
result was that GCC is working as intended:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-July/011879.html
On 17/09/15 21:39, Daniel Gutson wrote:
Hi,
we are working towards compiling RTEMS for gcc 5.2 (sinc
10 matches
Mail list logo
