Hi,
This is the patch for solving priority inversion problem for uniprocessor
architecture. It works correctly for all test cases on master. For 4.11 the
patch get applied cleanly but the branch does not compile because of some
rbtree error(unrelated to project). Github link:
https://github.com/sau
Thanks a lot for the detailed answer! We'll give it a try.
Btw:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> It can email the results if you like.
Was that an 'it' or an 'I'? If you have the output of the failed
25_algorithms/random_shuffle/moveable.cc test handy it would
definitely
On 9/4/2015 1:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 03/09/15 15:47, Martin Galvan wrote:
Hi Sebastian! Thanks for your answer. There are a couple of things I
still don't get :)
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
I updated the rtems-testing repository.
1. You have to adjust t
Hello Saurabh,
I created a ticket to document some requirements for a mutex
implementation. Its not complete and just a starting point:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2412
On 17/08/15 07:45, Saurabh Gadia wrote:
For every mutex held by a thread it is not feasible to have reference
to CORE_mu
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
>
> On 03/09/15 17:09, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Sebastian Huber
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ---
>>> doc/user/smp.t | 66
>>> ++
>>> 1 file changed, 66 inserti
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
>
> On 03/09/15 16:59, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Sebastian Huber
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >---
>>> > doc/user/smp.t | 38 ++
>>> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>>> >
>>> >di
