On 12/06/15 22:26, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Sebastian and others,
On Friday 12 of June 2015 17:47:42 Sebastian Huber wrote:
- Gedare Bloom schrieb:
I see. It provides the mutual exclusion for (SMP) applications that
rely on interrupt_disable/enable locks?
I guess we can never get rid of
On 19/06/15 07:23, Chris Johns wrote:
On 18/06/2015 5:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
What is the reason for this #undef?
I got warnings for printf in tcpdump for some reason so add the undef to
all symbols present.
Does it hurt having it present ?
Yes, since in this case we don't get the r
On 18/06/2015 5:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>>> >
>>> >What is the reason for this #undef?
>>> >
>> I got warnings for printf in tcpdump for some reason so add the undef to
>> all symbols present.
>>
>> Does it hurt having it present ?
>>
>
> Yes, since in this case we don't get the redefine
On 18/06/2015 5:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>>> Every RTEMS specific change should be in #ifdef __rtems__ sections. This
>>> is very helpful if you have to review files. This is missing in a couple
>>> of files.
>> In tcpdump.c there is '#if __rtems__' and so you are asking these always
>> be
On 18/06/15 03:31, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/06/2015 9:17 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 16/06/15 05:21, Chris Johns wrote:
Module:rtems-libbsd
Branch:master
Commit:affed5e3f586860e2fd97445eaa20674dc4bcd25
Changeset:
http://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?id=affed5e3f586860e2fd9
On 18/06/15 03:26, Chris Johns wrote:
>>diff --git a/rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-program.h
>>b/rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-program.h
>>index b2e542e..7c2837e 100644
>>--- a/rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-program.h
>>+++ b/rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-program.h
>>@@ -56,6
On 18/06/15 03:24, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/06/2015 9:08 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
This breaks the DHCP client.
I will fix this ...
ruru chris $ ls -las /dev/bpf*
0 crw--- 1 root wheel 0xc Jun 9 10:45 /dev/bpf
0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel3 Jun 9 10:45 /dev/bpf0 -> bpf
Looks lik