On 29/04/2015 8:05 pm, Hesham ALMatary wrote:
>
> This patch is needed, otherwise RSB wouldn't be able to build or1k
> toolchain. I was thinking of getting rid of this hash as this patch
> may be modified.
Normally a patch does not change and you increment a minor number or
change a date in the f
I've resolved all of Gedare's comments and slightly changed my proposal.
Here is the published link to the document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVEhyHXajAVMcqgrOR-0t84596QUkYOnifoaYpa8QYM/pub
I've also applied via SOCIS website today and mentioned the link above as
for my proposal.
Accord
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 29/04/2015 5:22 am, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 29/04/2015 4:48 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> Are other fields worth being
>>> used to sort? (Could be a small open project)
>>
>> It could be added without much effort. I will have a look.
>>
>
> I
It came to my attention that the Doodle interface is a bit awkward. To
register your time preferences you must hit the "Save" icon, which may
be presented at the far right of the schedule selection.
Gedare
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Congratulations to our accepted stu
Hi,
This patch is needed, otherwise RSB wouldn't be able to build or1k
toolchain. I was thinking of getting rid of this hash as this patch
may be modified. Or, we can refer directly to the latest or1k
gcc-4.9.2 [1] until they upstream it, as our patches are already
applied there.
[1] https://gith
