GSOC submissions closed

2015-03-27 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hi, Submissions have ended. We have received 18 legitimate applications, 3 spam, 1 duplicate, and 1 that was withdrawn. Any students who are eligible should submit applications to SOCIS as well. The general list of projects is at https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015 although not all of them sub

Re: GSoC 2015: create x86_64 BSP

2015-03-27 Thread Amar Takhar
On 2015-03-27 19:30 +0100, ala-eddine YAYAOUI wrote: > Hello all, > > My name is YAHIAOUI Ala Eddine, currently a student in 5th year at the Higher > National School in Computer Science in Algeria and I wish working with RTEMS > in > the GSOC 2015. > > I hope that i'm not too late to participate

GSoC 2015: create x86_64 BSP

2015-03-27 Thread ala-eddine YAYAOUI
Hello all, My name is YAHIAOUI Ala Eddine, currently a student in 5th year at the Higher National School in Computer Science in Algeria and I wish working with RTEMS in the GSOC 2015. I hope that i'm not too late to participate in the GSoC. I read the "Open Project" page and i found an interesti

Re: Static Analysis for RTEMS

2015-03-27 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 03/27/2015 09:33 AM, abd el-hamed Amer wrote: Dear All, First i thank Dr. joel for his advice in my last e-mail about this project. I already submitted a proposal. So please review it and I would be happy to hear your comments. I repeated my comments from the mailing list and added more.

Re: [GSoC] Raspberry Pi BSP proposal

2015-03-27 Thread Gedare Bloom
Please enable comments. -Gedare On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Carlos Falgueras García wrote: > Hello! > > I'm interesting to participate in GSoC with this organization. I've a > proposal for Rasberry Pi BSP layer improvement. I know maybe it's too late, > and that there are other proposal. Bu

[GSoC] Raspberry Pi BSP proposal

2015-03-27 Thread Carlos Falgueras García
Hello! I'm interesting to participate in GSoC with this organization. I've a proposal for Rasberry Pi BSP layer improvement. I know maybe it's too late, and that there are other proposal. But I have worked as hard and fast as I could, and I must try it. The link to the proposal: https://doc

Static Analysis for RTEMS

2015-03-27 Thread abd el-hamed Amer
Dear All, First i thank Dr. joel for his advice in my last e-mail about this project. I already submitted a proposal. So please review it and I would be happy to hear your comments. Title: " Stack Analysis for RTEMS" Best Regards, Abd elhamid ___ deve

Re: GSOC 2015: Improve Coverage Analysis

2015-03-27 Thread Gedare Bloom
Oops, for some reason, I only got a notification with the abstract in it from Melange. I'm taking a closer look now! Gedare On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Hermann Felbinger wrote: > Gedare, > > I cannot follow you. I used the proposal template resp. a copy of it and > provided the link at http

Re: GSOC 2015: Improve Coverage Analysis

2015-03-27 Thread Hermann Felbinger
Gedare, I cannot follow you. I used the proposal template resp. a copy of it and provided the link at https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015 . What is wrong? Thanks, Hermann Gedare Bloom schrieb am Fr., 27. März 2015 um 14:18 Uhr: > Hermann, > > You should use our proposal template > https://d

Re: [PATCH] TMS570: Add board reset code to bsp_reset

2015-03-27 Thread Gedare Bloom
It looks good to me I'll try to get to it if Sebastian doesn't. -Gedare On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Martin Galvan wrote: > --- > c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/tms570/include/tms570.h | 19 +++-- > c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/tms570/startup/bspreset.c | 37 > -- > 2 files

Re: GSOC 2015: Improve Coverage Analysis

2015-03-27 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hermann, You should use our proposal template https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F5XCodvX8AYNqWX5ssu7dfjkmFT__83uf8ABKbB_Pkg/edit?usp=sharing Thanks, Gedare On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Hermann Felbinger wrote: > Hi all, > > I am interested in working on coverage analysis for RTEMS at GSOC

Re: Introduction

2015-03-27 Thread Gedare Bloom
Yes you may add yourself, and you should put your official proposal into Google Melange. Please also take a look at the patch set (about 100 patches) that Daniel Hellstrom delivered recently, my comments on them, and contact him to inquire whether/what can be done in this direction. Gedare On Fri

[PATCH v2] Change the assert in _Thread_Dispatch_decrement_disable_level

2015-03-27 Thread Martin Galvan
While cpu_self->thread_dispatch_disable_level shouldn't ever be zero, it would be better to check it before doing the decrement. --- cpukit/score/src/threaddispatchdisablelevel.c | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/threaddispatchdisablelevel.c

Re: [PATCH] TMS570: Add board reset code to bsp_reset

2015-03-27 Thread Martin Galvan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Daniel Gutson > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Martin Galvan >> wrote: >>> --- >>> c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/tms570/include/tms570.h | 19 +++-- >>> c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/tms570/startup/bspr

Re: [PATCH] TMS570: Enable FPU in makefile.

2015-03-27 Thread Martin Galvan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote: > Hello Martin, > > this is the right and planned change. > > What are your results of testing the BSP? > Are there some stability issues or your combination > with HALcogen code and FPU passes tests suites. > Thanks for the feedback. From what w

GSOC 2015: Improve Coverage Analysis

2015-03-27 Thread Hermann Felbinger
Hi all, I am interested in working on coverage analysis for RTEMS at GSOC and beyond. I already submitted a proposal. So please review it and I would be happy to hear your comments. Title: "Improve Code Coverage Analysis Meeting Aviation and Automotive Standards" Best, Hermann __

Re: GSoC 2015: Beagleboard BSP Improvement

2015-03-27 Thread Ketul Shah
Sorry for that. My public proposal link is. http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/public/google/gsoc2015/ketul93/5629499534213120 Thanks. On 27 March 2015 at 12:11, Jarielle Catbagan wrote: > FYI, public proposals can not be accessed unless you provide the link > explicitly. > > On Thu,