On 14/03/2015 12:39 pm, Amar Takhar wrote:
On 11/03/2015 1:27 am, Karel Gardas wrote:
Yes, this is a big patch but if you do not merge it now and later
following waf work you do tree/file placement refactoring than the patch
would be even harder to merge.
I was thinking this would land in 4.12
On 15/03/2015 4:44 am, Ben Gras wrote:
Everytime I ./bootstrap && ./bootstrap -p,
I suggest you use the sb-bootstrap in the RSB and share the work between
all your cores. I run "./bootstrap -c && ./bootstrap -p &&
/somewhere/sb-bootstrap".
Chris
Thanks a lot! It helped
2015-03-15 23:24 GMT+02:00 Chris Johns :
> On 15/03/2015 1:35 am, Юрий Шевцов wrote:
>>
>> It fails and I don't why.
>
>
> Python development libraries are not installed. Please take a look at the
> various ways Python development libraries can be installed on Linux ..
> ht
On 15/03/2015 1:35 am, Юрий Шевцов wrote:
It fails and I don't why.
Python development libraries are not installed. Please take a look at
the various ways Python development libraries can be installed on Linux
.. https://docs.rtems.org/rsb/#_linux
Here is the log
http://paste.kolibrios.org
[ back on list ]
On 14/03/2015 9:51 pm, emanuel stiebler wrote:
On 2015-03-14 11:26, Chris Johns wrote:
On 14/03/2015 9:03 pm, emanuel stiebler wrote:
But, anyway, it still "thinks" it is on MinGW?
Hmm yeah which is not right. Can you send me the rsb-report file plus
the output of 'python
This patch adds a BSP variant for the Raspberry Pi 2.
--enable-rtemsbsp="raspberrypi2 raspberrypi"
For the current BSP, the only change was the peripheral register base
address and the compiler options.
The raspberrypi/make/custom rules were re-factored:
raspberrypi.inc -- Common rules
raspberrypi
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/configure.ac | 8 +++
.../libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/include/raspberrypi.h | 26 +-
.../arm/raspberrypi/make/custom/raspberrypi.cfg| 15 +
.../arm/raspberrypi/make/custom/raspberrypi.inc| 18 +++
.../a
On 15-03-2015 12:32, Alan Cudmore wrote:
Nice work Qiao!
Andre had submitted the patches for GPIO, SPI, and I2C including
recommended fixes. It was then recommended that we switch to the new
Linux based I2C API, and we ( or I ) got stuck there.
I have addressed almost every Pavel's suggestio
Nice work Qiao!
Andre had submitted the patches for GPIO, SPI, and I2C including
recommended fixes. It was then recommended that we switch to the new Linux
based I2C API, and we ( or I ) got stuck there.
For the time I have available, it was not going to be a 1 or 2 day fix to
move Andre's I2C imp
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:50 AM, QIAO YANG wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I've managed to run a hello demo on RPI B/B+, including a demo for loading
> an image by u-boot (I don't have an ethernet cable on my hand, but I'm
> going to be able to load the image by tftp for dev).
>
> If I've got it right, to prep
10 matches
Mail list logo
