Re: Starting with RTEMS

2015-02-16 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 2/16/2015 6:33 PM, Nick Withers wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 22:57 +0530, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I am trying to build RTEMS for arm. I want to know what --enable >> -rtemsbsp in config does, when building RTEMS. > Hi Rohini! > > It selects which Board Support Package(s) (BSP(s

Re: Starting with RTEMS

2015-02-16 Thread Nick Withers
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 22:57 +0530, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > > I am trying to build RTEMS for arm. I want to know what --enable > -rtemsbsp in config does, when building RTEMS. Hi Rohini! It selects which Board Support Package(s) (BSP(s)) you'd like to compile RTEMS for - or, if you pref

Starting with RTEMS

2015-02-16 Thread Rohini Kulkarni
Hi, I am trying to build RTEMS for arm. I want to know what --enable -rtemsbsp in config does, when building RTEMS. Thank you. -- Rohini Kulkarni ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [rtems commit] smpcapture02: Add test of functionality to add custom entries to capture trace

2015-02-16 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 2/16/2015 7:05 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 16/02/15 13:29, Daniel Cederman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Yes, that is, I think, due to the problem described in ticket #2180 >> "_TOD_Get_with_nanoseconds() is broken on SMP". I have a small hack >> that fixes the problem for Leon processors and then

Re: [rtems commit] smpcapture02: Add test of functionality to add custom entries to capture trace

2015-02-16 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 16/02/15 13:29, Daniel Cederman wrote: Hi, Yes, that is, I think, due to the problem described in ticket #2180 "_TOD_Get_with_nanoseconds() is broken on SMP". I have a small hack that fixes the problem for Leon processors and then the test passes. Ok, thanks for the hint. We have now a

Re: [rtems commit] smpcapture02: Add test of functionality to add custom entries to capture trace

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel Cederman
Hi, Yes, that is, I think, due to the problem described in ticket #2180 "_TOD_Get_with_nanoseconds() is broken on SMP". I have a small hack that fixes the problem for Leon processors and then the test passes. On 2015-02-16 13:12, Sebastian Huber wrote: This test fails on my NGMP board with:

Re: [rtems commit] smpcapture02: Add test of functionality to add custom entries to capture trace

2015-02-16 Thread Sebastian Huber
This test fails on my NGMP board with: *** BEGIN OF TEST SMPCAPTURE 2 *** rtems-4.11/c/src/../../testsuites/smptests/smpcapture02/init.c: 337 recs->time>=prev_rec->time On 11/02/15 16:34, Daniel Hellstrom wrote: Module:rtems Branch:master Commit:8d8573acc8f620c93afa8dd30ea8418d25a

[PATCH] score: Add _CPU_SMP_Prepare_start_multitasking()

2015-02-16 Thread Sebastian Huber
Update #2268. --- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/shared/arm-a9mpcore-smp.c | 5 + c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/qoriq/startup/bspsmp.c | 5 + c/src/lib/libbsp/shared/bspsmp.c| 4 c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/startup/bspsmp.c | 13 + cpukit/score/cpu/arm/rtems/score/