On 14/02/15 02:58, Cudmore, Alan P. (GSFC-5820) wrote:
A project is looking at using RTEMS on an FPGA based ARM Cortex-M1 like
the one in the Microsemi ProAsic3L development kit:
http://www.microsemi.com/products/fpga-soc/design-resources/dev-kits/proasi
c3/cortex-m1-enabled-proasic3l-development
A project is looking at using RTEMS on an FPGA based ARM Cortex-M1 like
the one in the Microsemi ProAsic3L development kit:
http://www.microsemi.com/products/fpga-soc/design-resources/dev-kits/proasi
c3/cortex-m1-enabled-proasic3l-development-kit
Wikipedia says the Cortex-M1 is an ARMv6M architect
I will be rebuilding most of our web services before installing a commercial
SSL
certificate.
All of our HTTP and some FTP, Git and other services will be going up/down as I
work on them.
Amar.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rte
Just to clarify: the ability to provide a new piece of binary
corresponding to a driver and replace the existing one.
Have anybody tried this before?
Thanks!
Daniel.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Gutson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>is there any current experience / support with hot patchin
Hi
I was looking at libcsupport/src/open_dev_console.c and had
a few thoughts.
(1) Since this method is only configured to be used when the
console driver is installed, should we now consider it a fatal
error if the first open() fails? The error decision was made
before we could drop this method
Hi
I noticed running fileio.exe that _Copyright_Notice is out of date.
I can update the year but should it be changed more?
I don't think this impacts the minimum size.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line Applications R
Hi,
is there any current experience / support with hot patching? E.g.
patching a driver while the whole system is running.
Thanks,
Daniel.
--
Daniel F. Gutson
Chief Engineering Officer, SPD
San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5
Córdoba, Argentina
Phone: +54 351 4217888 / +54 351 42182
On 2/13/2015 2:54 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 13/02/2015 7:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 13/02/15 08:56, Daniel Cederman wrote:
Daniel(s), could enlighten me why this is needed ? Is this a arch
constraint or something else ?
Chris
>>> It is an arch constraint. On SPARC, f
On 13/02/2015 7:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/02/15 08:56, Daniel Cederman wrote:
> Daniel(s), could enlighten me why this is needed ? Is this a arch
> constraint or something else ?
>
> Chris
It is an arch constraint. On SPARC, for example, all memory accesses
needs to a be aligned. Fro
On 13/02/15 08:56, Daniel Cederman wrote:
> Daniel(s), could enlighten me why this is needed ? Is this a arch
> constraint or something else ?
>
> Chris
It is an arch constraint. On SPARC, for example, all memory accesses
needs to a be aligned. From the SPARC V8 manual:
"Halfword accesses mu
On 12/02/15 21:55, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is there any guidance for the (unexpected) user using the
miniIMFS? The configuration parameter just went away.
Can it be an error in confdefs.h?
Yes, good idea, I will add an error to confdefs.h. I am not finished
with the work, my ultimate goal is to
11 matches
Mail list logo