Re: BSP requests.

2015-02-10 Thread Amar Takhar
On 2015-02-10 21:57 -0500, Alan Cudmore wrote: > Raspberry Pi times on my PC ( 6 core AMD, 8GB RAM, SSD , Ubuntu 14.04 ) : > > Standard build system: > ? ? Bootstrap : 7m4s > ? ? Configure step: 8s > ? ? Build: 3m15s? > > ? ? Size of RTEMS Tree after bootstrap: 308Mbytes > > Waf build: > ?

Re: Waf branch - Configuration [4/6]

2015-02-10 Thread Amar Takhar
On 2015-02-11 14:16 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: > And as I see below options can be altered in a controlled manner instead > of a local patch applied after the config phase. This is what I was meaning. Ah, yes it's very controlled in config.cfg. The options are verified (not fully, yet) for sanit

Re: Waf branch - Configuration [4/6]

2015-02-10 Thread Chris Johns
On 10/02/2015 8:20 am, Amar Takhar wrote: On 2015-02-10 08:15 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: Look in config.cfg when you do a 'waf' configure for all the available options these are exposed there. Do I just edit these options ? Yes. If so, is this temporary or the way we do this ? I am consi

Re: BSP requests.

2015-02-10 Thread Chris Johns
On 11/02/2015 1:57 pm, Alan Cudmore wrote: Raspberry Pi times on my PC ( 6 core AMD, 8GB RAM, SSD , Ubuntu 14.04 ) : Standard build system: Bootstrap : 7m4s Configure step: 8s Build: 3m15s Size of RTEMS Tree after bootstrap: 308Mbytes Waf build: configure: ~4s build wit

Re: BSP requests.

2015-02-10 Thread Alan Cudmore
Raspberry Pi times on my PC ( 6 core AMD, 8GB RAM, SSD , Ubuntu 14.04 ) : Standard build system: Bootstrap : 7m4s Configure step: 8s Build: 3m15s Size of RTEMS Tree after bootstrap: 308Mbytes Waf build: configure: ~4s build with tests: 29s Size of RTEMS tree : 188Mbytes Ni

Re: [PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable

2015-02-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 2/10/2015 3:46 PM, Peter Dufault wrote: >> On Feb 10, 2015, at 15:30 , Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> On 2/10/2015 2:26 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Joel Sherrill >>> wrote: Thanks. One down. Crap. It should have had a comment that closed the PR.

Re: [PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable

2015-02-10 Thread Peter Dufault
> On Feb 10, 2015, at 15:30 , Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On 2/10/2015 2:26 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Joel Sherrill >> wrote: >>> Thanks. One down. >>> >>> Crap. It should have had a comment that closed the PR. :( >> Who should add the comment? The ticket is n

Re: [PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable

2015-02-10 Thread Gedare Bloom
Yeah if you don't mind, when you now the ticket number, just include something like "closes #xyz" On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Joel Sherrill > wrote: >> Thanks. One down. >> >> Crap. It should have had a comment that closed the PR. :

Re: [PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable

2015-02-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 2/10/2015 2:26 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Joel Sherrill > wrote: >> Thanks. One down. >> >> Crap. It should have had a comment that closed the PR. :( > Who should add the comment? The ticket is now closed (fixed). In the > future patches, should I tag the tic

Re: [PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable

2015-02-10 Thread Hesham Moustafa
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Thanks. One down. > > Crap. It should have had a comment that closed the PR. :( Who should add the comment? The ticket is now closed (fixed). In the future patches, should I tag the ticket/PR number part of the commit message? > On 2/10/2015

Re: [PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable

2015-02-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
Thanks. One down. Crap. It should have had a comment that closed the PR. :( On 2/10/2015 2:04 PM, Hesham ALMatary wrote: > --- > cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c | 7 ++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c > i

[PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable

2015-02-10 Thread Hesham ALMatary
--- cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c index 9d1ae49..69845ff 100644 --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c +++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c @@ -14,9 +14,14 @@ #include #incl

Re: [PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable instead

2015-02-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
This looks great if it had a comment. :) On 2/10/2015 1:50 PM, Hesham ALMatary wrote: > --- > cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c > index 9d1ae49..4d6e9c0 100644 > --- a/cp

[PATCH] score/or1k/cpu.c: discard linker-symbols.h include and extern the related variable instead

2015-02-10 Thread Hesham ALMatary
--- cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c index 9d1ae49..4d6e9c0 100644 --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c +++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/or1k/cpu.c @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ #include #include

Re: [PATCH 3/7] IMFS: Simplify IMFS_symlink()

2015-02-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 09/02/15 22:28, Gedare Bloom wrote: Nit: should the counted string functions be used? No, the allocation part takes care that we have enough space in the buffer. On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: --- cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_symlink.c | 33 +++--