On January 10, 2015 5:38:58 PM CST, Chris Johns wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am wondering about relaxing the need for cvs to be found in the RSB.
>I
>am not aware of any projects we need cvs to access now we are using a
>git repo for newlib.
>
>Any objections to me removing it ?
None from me.
>Chris
>_
Hi,
I am wondering about relaxing the need for cvs to be found in the RSB. I
am not aware of any projects we need cvs to access now we are using a
git repo for newlib.
Any objections to me removing it ?
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
Committed. I am also trying to figure out what should be used in the
RSB to build a current toolset:
I have a local change to upgrade to dtc 1.4.1 since the location of 1.2.0
no longer exists. That got me to the point where gcc 4.9.2 is built.
I tried the build with binutils 2.24 and binutils 2.
Joel Sherrill writes:
> Hi
>
> This is with the binutils and gcc heads.
>
> moxie-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe -B../../../../../.././lib/
> -B../../../../../.././moxiesim/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -isystem ../../../../../.././moxiesim/lib/include
> -DASM -Os -g -ffunction-section