On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Dominik Taborsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a university student and am looking for a school project. I am
> interested in RTEMS and so I thought I could help out with development.
> The project should take several "school months". It should also involve
> the kernel
Hello,
I am a university student and am looking for a school project. I am
interested in RTEMS and so I thought I could help out with development.
The project should take several "school months". It should also involve
the kernel space, not user space.
I have browsed through the wiki/trac and I
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 13:55 , Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> I guess the difference is whether the assert implies a local
> assumption (I require this var is not NULL) or a global one (This var
> has been previously verified to be not NULL). It may be worth
> classifying asserts in those two categories
On 11/28/2014 04:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 27/11/14 20:43, Joel Sherrill wrote:
sparc/sis
===
Passed: 511
Failed: 3
Timeouts: 7
Invalid:0
-
Total:521
Failures:
heapwalk.exe
dl02.exe
psx13.exe
Timeouts:
*** Interactiv
Great, thanks for doing this, the stats look a lot cleaner to me.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> On 27/11/14 16:40, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> Any particular reason for dropping memalign_calls?
>
>
> If you are interested in particular function calls, then I suggest to u
On 27/11/14 16:40, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Any particular reason for dropping memalign_calls?
If you are interested in particular function calls, then I suggest to
use some sort of tracing.
Any other stats get dropped?
I added the dropped stats to the Heap_Statistics:
http://git.rtems.org/r
On 27/11/14 20:43, Joel Sherrill wrote:
sparc/sis
===
Passed: 511
Failed: 3
Timeouts: 7
Invalid:0
-
Total:521
Failures:
heapwalk.exe
dl02.exe
psx13.exe
Timeouts:
*** Interactive
termios.exe, pppd.exe, capture.exe, top.exe
