Test failures on arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu

Hello, on the latest Git master the following new tests fail on arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu due to a timeout after 180 seconds: top, dl01.pre and dl02.pre. Attached are the log files. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 1

Re: [PATCH] Add GPIO, I2C and SPI support for the RPi BSP

On 5/11/2014 2:40 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: These are ideal for BSP-specific testing framework, which we presently lack. I'm not certain where they should go. What about examples-v2 ? You could add a boards directory and the code under arch/bsp. The waf build system lets you know when a specific

Re: [PATCH] Add GPIO, I2C and SPI support for the RPi BSP

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On November 4, 2014 5:27:51 PM CST, Andre Marques > wrote: >>On 11/04/14 23:16, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> On 11/4/2014 5:01 PM, Andre Marques wrote: Hi gedare, will send a new version of this patch in the next few days. >>>

Re: [PATCH] Add GPIO, I2C and SPI support for the RPi BSP

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andre Marques wrote: > Hi gedare, > > will send a new version of this patch in the next few days. > > Replies to your comments below. > > --André Marques. > > On 10/31/14 14:25, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> Thanks, I'll leave detailed comments to the experts but notice

Re: [PATCH] Add GPIO, I2C and SPI support for the RPi BSP

Hello Pavel, On 10/31/14 15:41, Pavel Pisa wrote: Hello Andre, On Friday 31 of October 2014 12:56:40 Andre Marques wrote: +/** + * @brief Generic ISR that clears the event register on the Raspberry Pi and calls + *an user defined ISR. + * + * @param[in] arg Void pointer to a handler_a

Re: [PATCH] Add GPIO, I2C and SPI support for the RPi BSP

On November 4, 2014 5:27:51 PM CST, Andre Marques wrote: >On 11/04/14 23:16, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On 11/4/2014 5:01 PM, Andre Marques wrote: >>> Hi gedare, >>> >>> will send a new version of this patch in the next few days. >>> >>> Replies to your comments below. >>> >> I am too overwhelmed

Re: [PATCH 1/7] libdl/Makefile.am: Need preinstall on all targets

On 5/11/2014 8:47 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 11/4/2014 3:29 PM, Chris Johns wrote: Hi Joel, These look fine. All of these patches? Yes. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH 1/7] libdl/Makefile.am: Need preinstall on all targets

On 11/4/2014 3:29 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > Hi Joel, > > These look fine. All of these patches? --joel > Chris > > On 5/11/2014 8:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> --- >> cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/cpukit/libdl/Makefile.

Re: [PATCH 1/7] libdl/Makefile.am: Need preinstall on all targets

Hi Joel, These look fine. Chris On 5/11/2014 8:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: --- cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am b/cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am index 11f1478..5c3cd15 100644 --- a/cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am ++

[PATCH 7/7] lpc23xx_tli800-testsuite.tcfg: Add dl01

--- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc24xx/make/custom/lpc23xx_tli800-testsuite.tcfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc24xx/make/custom/lpc23xx_tli800-testsuite.tcfg b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc24xx/make/custom/lpc23xx_tli800-testsuite.tcfg index b63ed50..5d303a9 10

[PATCH 5/7] lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg: Add rbheap01

--- .../arm/lpc176x/make/custom/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc176x/make/custom/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc176x/make/custom/lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram_eth-testsuite.tcfg in

[PATCH 6/7] lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg: Add dl01

--- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc24xx/make/custom/lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc24xx/make/custom/lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc24xx/make/custom/lpc2362-testsuite.tcfg index 46897d4..1559e3d 100644 --- a/c/src/lib/l

[PATCH 1/7] libdl/Makefile.am: Need preinstall on all targets

--- cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am b/cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am index 11f1478..5c3cd15 100644 --- a/cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am +++ b/cpukit/libdl/Makefile.am @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ libdl_a_SOURCES = \ libdl_a_SOURCE

[PATCH 4/7] lm3s3749-testsuite.tcfg: Add dl01

--- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lm3s69xx/make/custom/lm3s3749-testsuite.tcfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lm3s69xx/make/custom/lm3s3749-testsuite.tcfg b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lm3s69xx/make/custom/lm3s3749-testsuite.tcfg index bc92170..30aaea0 100644 --- a/c/src

[PATCH 2/7] libdl/rtl-mdreloc-bfin.c: Include rtems/rtl/rtl.h not rtl.h

--- cpukit/libdl/rtl-mdreloc-bfin.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libdl/rtl-mdreloc-bfin.c b/cpukit/libdl/rtl-mdreloc-bfin.c index 1c9fd5b..d855d30 100644 --- a/cpukit/libdl/rtl-mdreloc-bfin.c +++ b/cpukit/libdl/rtl-mdreloc-bfin.c @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ #incl

[PATCH 3/7] sapi/src/testextension.c: Fix warnings

--- cpukit/sapi/src/testextension.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/cpukit/sapi/src/testextension.c b/cpukit/sapi/src/testextension.c index e1a1985..f59ae0d 100644 --- a/cpukit/sapi/src/testextension.c +++ b/cpukit/sapi/src/testextension.c @@ -19,10 +19,12 @@ #include #inc

Re: RTEMS+LWIP for LPC1768 BSP

Hi! We are currently using a LWIP implementation on the Beagle Bone Black bsp, recently uploaded by Ben Gras. We developed this port based on ethernet and lwip drivers from StarterWare drivers of Texas Instrument. We took this port, that was intended for baremetal use and added a posix implementat

raspberry pi and dl01

Hi Looks like a weak symbol issue with the loader: arm-rtems4.11-gcc -B../../../../../raspberrypi/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems -mcpu=arm1176jzf-s -O2 -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wimplicit-function-declaration -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs -mcpu=arm1176jzf-s \ -o dl01.exe i

RE: [PATCH 2/4] capture: Add SMP support.

> -Original Message- > From: ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu [mailto:ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu] On > Behalf Of Gedare Bloom > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 10:16 AM > To: Jennifer Averett > Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] capture: Add SMP support. > > I was reviewing this code a

Re: smpcapture01 explanation and expected output.

Thanks, I was going to ask for more explanation on that patch itself. This documentation should accompany the test-case. -Gedare On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jennifer Averett wrote: > I was asked to post an explanation of the a test I just submitted for review > (smpcapture01). It is a new S

Re: [PATCH 3/4] capture01: Add SMP support into capture engine.

The commit message is a bit too vague and maybe misleading. It should reflect this changes the capture test to use the SMP support -Gedare On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Jennifer Averett wrote: > --- > testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c | 249 > ++- > 1 file c

Re: [PATCH] (2 commits squashed into one) Beagle BSP for review

I just checked, it runs on the bbxm hardware too, not just the emulator. On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Ben Gras wrote: > All, > > Ok, as promised, I rebased and re-tested and have found & included a > portable way of making the SD card image (included in sdcard.sh), to be > merged with RSB (i

Re: [PATCH 2/4] capture: Add SMP support.

I was reviewing this code and lost my spot. There are some notes below, but I have no more time to weed through. I'd recommend splitting this patch into more pieces: 1) Moving code into capture_support. 2) Adding SMP support. 3) Fixing formatting/style/documentation issues in legacy portions. Curr

Re: libdl: rtems.git dependence on rtems-tools.git

On October 30, 2014 9:18:29 PM CDT, Gedare Bloom wrote: >On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 31/10/2014 6:42 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Gedare Bloom >wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chris Johns >wrote: > > H

smpcapture01 explanation and expected output.

I was asked to post an explanation of the a test I just submitted for review (smpcapture01). It is a new SMP test added that does a worst case migration of 4 tasks on a 4 core system tracking and displaying the user extension records. This task is rather complex to describe but using the notati

[PATCH 3/4] capture01: Add SMP support into capture engine.

--- testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c | 249 ++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c b/testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c index a725e26..e1e1e84 100644 --- a/testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c

[PATCH 4/4] smpcapture01: New test.

--- testsuites/smptests/Makefile.am | 1 + testsuites/smptests/configure.ac | 1 + testsuites/smptests/smpcapture01/Makefile.am | 19 ++ testsuites/smptests/smpcapture01/init.c | 273 ++ testsuites/smptests/smpcapture01/smp

[PATCH 2/4] capture: Add SMP support.

To support smp data was broken into global and percpu capture data. Capture control must be disabled prior to printing or setting of watch points. Methods to print the data were moved from capture-cli into a support area and are no longer static so that they can be shared by test routines, or appl

[PATCH 1/4] capture: Move logging of task record to occur after filter check.

The catpture task record is now logged just prior to the first log entry using that task instead of the first time the task is seen. This involved splitting the record task method into an initialize task and a record task. --- cpukit/libmisc/capture/capture.c| 39 +