Hello Pavel,
On 31/10/14 02:04, Pavel Pisa wrote:
I am starting to test GCC-4.9.2 toolchain with actual RTEMS
and I have noticed that when I use actual Newlib GIT
there is added
#if __BSD_VISIBLE || (defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && __XSI_VISIBLE < 500)
int _EXFUN(sethostname, (const char *, size_
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 31/10/2014 6:42 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
Libdl tests in the testsuite depend on tools in rtems-to
Hello Sebastian,
I am starting to test GCC-4.9.2 toolchain with actual RTEMS
and I have noticed that when I use actual Newlib GIT
there is added
#if __BSD_VISIBLE || (defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && __XSI_VISIBLE < 500)
int _EXFUN(sethostname, (const char *, size_t));
#endif
to include/sys/unistd.
Hi all,
I have pushed the RTL code to our git master. The code resides under
cpukit/libdl and user access is via the dlopen, dlclose and dlinfo
family of calls. The test output with the SIS BSP is:
$ sparc-rtems4.11-run $(find . -name dl01.exe)
*** BEGIN OF TEST libdl (RTL) Loader 1 ***
load:
On 31/10/2014 6:42 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
Libdl tests in the testsuite depend on tools in rtems-tools.git/linkers.
Should I raise a configure error if the tools are not found or not
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Libdl tests in the testsuite depend on tools in rtems-tools.git/linkers.
>> Should I raise a configure error if the tools are not found or not build the
>> tests ?
>>
>> Raising
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Libdl tests in the testsuite depend on tools in rtems-tools.git/linkers.
> Should I raise a configure error if the tools are not found or not build the
> tests ?
>
> Raising an error is my preferred option because libdl for the supporte
Hi,
Libdl tests in the testsuite depend on tools in rtems-tools.git/linkers.
Should I raise a configure error if the tools are not found or not build
the tests ?
Raising an error is my preferred option because libdl for the supported
archs is tested however it creates a dependency between rt
On 10/30/2014 12:06 PM, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> Addressing all the comments. About the scoped blocks I used the style
> that existed in cpuusage already. That section of code is modified code
> from rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin.
Just reformat it. :)
--joel
> Jennifer
>
>> -Original
Addressing all the comments. About the scoped blocks I used the style
that existed in cpuusage already. That section of code is modified code
from rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin.
Jennifer
> -Original Message-
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Gedare Bloom
On 10/30/2014 10:11 AM, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> My name and email are correct in git config.
And if it was converting git accounts into email addresses,
I would just be joel@ which would likely bounce as well.
-joel
>> -Original Message-
>> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] O
My name and email are correct in git config.
> -Original Message-
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Gedare Bloom
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 10:08 AM
> To: Joel Sherrill
> Cc: Jennifer Averett; rtems-de...@rtems.org
> Subject: Re: [rtems commit] libmisc: Ad
The problem may be a setup issue on git.rtems.org, where it converts
from user login to email, I think it might be doing something dumb
like just taking login-name @rtems.org
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 10/30/2014 9:55 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> The email address
On 10/30/2014 9:55 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> The email address came from VC, so it is a problem in the commit setup I
> guess.
OK. I will help her double check. Working on multiple machines,
I periodically find one that is wrong for myself. :(
--joel
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Joel She
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> On 29/10/14 22:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> Very desirable
>> =
>> + x86 context switch SMP handoff logic
>
>
> For someone with good enough x86 assembly skills, this should be fairly
> simple. You just have to implement the
The email address came from VC, so it is a problem in the commit setup I guess.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> FWIW she is jennifer.aver...@rtems.org not jennifer@.
>
> --joel
>
> On 10/30/2014 9:53 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> I missed reviewing this patch earlier, but th
FWIW she is jennifer.aver...@rtems.org not jennifer@.
--joel
On 10/30/2014 9:53 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I missed reviewing this patch earlier, but there are some style
> problems with it, please fix them on the head.
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>> Module:
I missed reviewing this patch earlier, but there are some style
problems with it, please fix them on the head.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> Module:rtems
> Branch:master
> Commit:6031da438d219c6ec5d9d48f1df2aef91710cce3
> Changeset:
> http://git.rtems.or
On 10/30/2014 9:32 AM, Andreas Larsson wrote:
> On 2014-10-30 15:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 30/10/14 15:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> On 10/30/2014 8:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 23/10/14 19:46, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> Running the leon3 with grsim fails due to the patch
>
>
On 2014-10-30 15:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 30/10/14 15:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/30/2014 8:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 23/10/14 19:46, Jennifer Averett wrote:
Running the leon3 with grsim fails due to the patch
bsp/sparc: Ensure that data cache snooping is enabled
It looks like
On 10/30/2014 8:39 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 28/10/14 16:17, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>> +/* Count the number of tasks and sort this load value */
>> +task_count++;
>> +for (i = 0; i < RTEMS_CPUUSAGE_TOP_MAX_LOAD_TASKS; i++) {
>> + if (load_tas
On 30/10/14 15:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/30/2014 8:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 23/10/14 19:46, Jennifer Averett wrote:
Running the leon3 with grsim fails due to the patch
bsp/sparc: Ensure that data cache snooping is enabled
It looks like cache snooping is disabled when it is ran fo
On 10/30/2014 8:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 23/10/14 19:46, Jennifer Averett wrote:
Running the leon3 with grsim fails due to the patch
bsp/sparc: Ensure that data cache snooping is enabled
It looks like cache snooping is disabled when it is ran for all
the tests. Where is this supposed
On 23/10/14 19:46, Jennifer Averett wrote:
Running the leon3 with grsim fails due to the patch
bsp/sparc: Ensure that data cache snooping is enabled
It looks like cache snooping is disabled when it is ran for all
the tests. Where is this supposed to be set at with this change?
The simulator
On 28/10/14 16:17, Jennifer Averett wrote:
+/* Count the number of tasks and sort this load value */
+task_count++;
+for (i = 0; i < RTEMS_CPUUSAGE_TOP_MAX_LOAD_TASKS; i++) {
+ if (load_tasks[i]) {
+if ((l == 0) || (l < load[i]))
+
On 29/10/14 22:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Very desirable
=
+ x86 context switch SMP handoff logic
For someone with good enough x86 assembly skills, this should be fairly simple.
You just have to implement the sequence described here:
http://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/score/cp
On 14/10/14 12:47, Мороз Олег wrote:
arm-rtems4.11-readelf -l shell.exe
Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file)
Entry point 0x8000189
There are 4 program headers, starting at offset 52
Program Headers:
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
EXIDX 0
On 29/10/14 17:49, Chris Nott wrote:
Hi,
I have a BSP almost identical to STM32F4 except I want a slight change to the
linker settings (I want to offset the start location because there is a
bootloader at location 0).
Two questions:
- Is there any way to do this other than to
a) duplicate th
28 matches
Mail list logo
