On 30/09/2014 3:26 am, Peter Dufault wrote:
On Sep 29, 2014, at 02:15 , Chris Johns wrote:
I can add the scripts to INI file format. I feel XML is too heavy a
requirement for parsing. There is a single C++ file that does it and
Python handles the format easily. I also think it is easier to re
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 9/29/2014 2:53 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
>
> Thanks for committing.
>
> There are some other few pending patches. This one [1] adds
> qemu-system-or32 script to sim-scripts, and this [2] adds a new RTEMS
> tester script to test or1ks
On 9/29/2014 2:53 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
> Thanks for committing.
>
> There are some other few pending patches. This one [1] adds
> qemu-system-or32 script to sim-scripts, and this [2] adds a new RTEMS
> tester script to test or1ksim BSP running on qemu.
>
> [1] http://lists.rtems.org/piperma
Thanks for committing.
There are some other few pending patches. This one [1] adds
qemu-system-or32 script to sim-scripts, and this [2] adds a new RTEMS
tester script to test or1ksim BSP running on qemu.
[1] http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2014-September/008064.html
[2] http://lists.rtems.
Sorry. This is now committed.
Anything else besides the task stack initialization patch?
--joel
On 9/29/2014 12:57 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch is needed for capture, pppd and any other tests that prompt
> users to input data interactively.
>
> Regards,
> Hesham
>
> On Fri, Se
On Sep 29, 2014, at 02:15 , Chris Johns wrote:
> I can add the scripts to INI file format. I feel XML is too heavy a
> requirement for parsing. There is a single C++ file that does it and
> Python handles the format easily. I also think it is easier to read.
Yes, INI is easier to read but XML
