rtems-tld update.

Hello, I have pushed updates to rtems-tld to rtems-tools.git plus changes to examples-v2 to trace into RTEMS. The trace for sparc/sis is attached. To run build and install the rtems-tools and install to the same location as my tools using the same prefix: $ git clone git://git.rtems.org/rt

Re: or1ksim: Updated results from RTEMS Tester

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 21/09/2014 10:00 am, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Chris Johns > > wrote: >> >> What does --jobs=none return as results ? >> >> Only "RTEMS Testing - Tester, v0.2.0" and no tests r

Re: or1ksim: Updated results from RTEMS Tester

On 21/09/2014 10:00 am, Hesham Moustafa wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: What does --jobs=none return as results ? Only "RTEMS Testing - Tester, v0.2.0" and no tests run. This looks like a bug. Can you please try --jobs=1 ? Chris _

Re: or1ksim: Updated results from RTEMS Tester

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On September 20, 2014 6:15:13 PM CDT, Chris Johns > wrote: > >On 21/09/2014 8:57 am, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Chris Johns >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 20/09/2014 3:

Re: or1ksim: Updated results from RTEMS Tester

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 21/09/2014 8:57 am, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Chris Johns > > wrote: >> >> On 20/09/2014 3:13 pm, Hesham Moustafa wrote: >> >> I have 4 physical cores, and I usua

Re: or1ksim: Updated results from RTEMS Tester

On September 20, 2014 6:15:13 PM CDT, Chris Johns wrote: >On 21/09/2014 8:57 am, Hesham Moustafa wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Chris Johns > > wrote: >> >> On 20/09/2014 3:13 pm, Hesham Moustafa wrote: >> >> I have 4 physical cores, and I u

Re: or1ksim: Updated results from RTEMS Tester

On 21/09/2014 8:57 am, Hesham Moustafa wrote: On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: On 20/09/2014 3:13 pm, Hesham Moustafa wrote: I have 4 physical cores, and I usually run make with J8. My host OS is fedora 20. Try wit

Re: or1ksim: Updated results from RTEMS Tester

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 20/09/2014 3:13 pm, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > >> I have 4 physical cores, and I usually run make with J8. My host OS is >> fedora 20. >> > > Try with --jobs=4 and see if you get any time outs. Anything else running > at the same time may eff

Re: [PATCH] bsp:stm32f4XXXX system clock configuration

Style comments from me. I will let those who know who the HW comment on that. On September 20, 2014 1:23:26 PM CDT, "tomasz.grego...@gmail.com" wrote: >From: Tomasz Gregorek > >Added simple math to caclulate register values for the PLL >and for the prescalers. It will try to keep 48MHz for the

[PATCH] bsp:stm32f4XXXX system clock configuration

From: Tomasz Gregorek Added simple math to caclulate register values for the PLL and for the prescalers. It will try to keep 48MHz for the USB OTG FS. Also it will slow down Flash memory for the high speeds. --- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f4/include/stm32f4.h | 10 + .../libbsp/arm/stm32f4/i

Re: [PATCH] bsp:stm32f4XXXX system clock configuration

sorry, ignore this one. 2014-09-20 20:15 GMT+02:00 : > From: Tomasz Gregorek > > Added simple math to caclulate register values for the PLL > and for the prescalers. It will try to keep 48MHz for the USB OTG FS. > Also it will slow down Flash memory for the high speeds. > --- > c/src/lib/libbs

[PATCH] bsp:stm32f4XXXX system clock configuration

From: Tomasz Gregorek Added simple math to caclulate register values for the PLL and for the prescalers. It will try to keep 48MHz for the USB OTG FS. Also it will slow down Flash memory for the high speeds. --- c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f4/include/stm32f4.h | 10 + .../libbsp/arm/stm32f4/i