On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 16:44 +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following the announcement[1] on intention to retire main GlusterFS
> package from Fedora 42 I thought it wouldn't make sense to have
> glusterfs-coreutils package as it is heavily dependent on glusterfs.
> There is no active developmen
Hi,
Following the announcement[1] on intention to retire main GlusterFS
package from Fedora 42 I thought it wouldn't make sense to have
glusterfs-coreutils package as it is heavily dependent on glusterfs.
There is no active development effort in upstream[2] for glusterfs-
coreutils.
Therefore I i
