Fedora eln compose report: 20250111.n.0 changes

2025-01-10 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250110.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250111.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:15 Upgraded packages: 18 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:21.02 MiB Size

Re: bin-sbin merge rebuild

2025-01-10 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 4:17 PM Jerry James wrote: > The builds are done. I just submitted an update to bodhi, so the side > tag should be merged into Rawhide soon. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-5fc7b516ce I forgot to mention that plplot failed to build. There is alrea

Re: bin-sbin merge rebuild

2025-01-10 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 1:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I think it's better to keep calm and keep business as usual ;) What's the problem with a little panic? :-) > Please finish with your side tag and just ping me when it's merged. The builds are done. I just submitted an update

Re: Heads-up: Upcoming python-hypothesis update in Rawhide

2025-01-10 Thread Michel Lind
On Fri, 2025-01-03 at 16:09 -0600, Michel Lind wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm working on a Hypothesis update in Rawhide - we generally try and > update it at least once per release cycle, and only in Rawhide, to > keep > it reasonably up to date. > > Most of the 78 dependents rebuild fine: > https://

AVX but not AVX2: F42 Change Proposal: Optimized Binaries for the AMD64 / x86_64

2025-01-10 Thread John Reiser
A vendor-independent x86-64 psABI supplement defines four "microachitecture levels": `x86-64-v1` (the baseline, our code targets this), `x86-64-v2` (+`SSE3`, CentoOS targets this), `x86-64-v3` (+`AVX`), `x86-64-v4` (+`AVX512`) [1]. The levels are not explicit about the classification of a CPU tha

Re: F42 Change Proposal: RPM Support For Systemd Sysusers.d (system-wide)

2025-01-10 Thread Steve Grubb
On Friday, January 10, 2025 10:20:07 AM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 01:08:38PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > * Verify that audit events exist for user and group creation: > > > >ausearch --start recent -i -m > > > > 'ADD_USER,USER_MGMT,USER_CHAUTH

Re: Retiring python-nose from Fedora 43+

2025-01-10 Thread Michel Lind
On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 12:45 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I propose we retire python-nose from Fedora 43+ immediately after > branching. > > The package has been deprecated for 5 years: > >    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose > > It does not build with Python 3.14:

ELN SIG Meeting Minutes 2025-Jan-10

2025-01-10 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-10/eln.2025-01-10-17.02.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-10/eln.2025-01-10-17.02.log.html Text Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matri

F42 Change Proposal: Unification of boot loader updates, phase 1 (system-wide)

2025-01-10 Thread Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderUpdatesPhase1 Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-unification-of-boot-loader-updates-phase-1-system-wide/142035 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change.

F42 Change Proposal: Trafficserver 10.0 (self-contained)

2025-01-10 Thread Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/Trafficserver_10.0 Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-trafficserver-10-0-self-contained/142034 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of t

F42 Change Proposal: Optimized Binaries for the AMD64 / x86_64 Architecture (v2) (self-contained)

2025-01-10 Thread Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Optimized_Binaries_for_the_AMD64_Architecture_v2 Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-optimized-binaries-for-the-amd64-x86-64-architecture-v2-self-contained/142032 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. T

F42 Change Proposal: Koji uses Red Hat Image Builder locally (system-wide)

2025-01-10 Thread Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KojiLocalImageBuilder Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-koji-uses-red-hat-image-builder-locally-system-wide/142031 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As p

F42 Change Proposal: Stop building Flatpaks for PPC64LE (self-contained)

2025-01-10 Thread Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksNoPpc64le Discussion Thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-stop-building-flatpaks-for-ppc64le-self-contained/142029 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of

Re: Self-reintroduction, reflections, and so forth

2025-01-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 06:51:18PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 3:53 PM Michel Lind wrote: > > Ahh, the perfect person to deal with our s390x capacity crunch ;) > > > > Yes! Actually, I think Kevin and IT just applied a bandaid that has made a > significant improvement

Re: F42 Change Proposal: RPM Support For Systemd Sysusers.d (system-wide)

2025-01-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 01:08:38PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > * Verify that audit events exist for user and group creation: >ausearch --start recent -i -m > 'ADD_USER,USER_MGMT,USER_CHAUTHTOK,ROLE_ASSIGN,ROLE_REMOVE,DEL_USER,ADD_GROUP,GRP_MGMT,GRP_CHAUTHTOK,DEL_GROUP' > * Remove the packa

Review swaps

2025-01-10 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! I've got two relatively simple Python packages I'd like to be reviewed: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2336406 python-eth-stdlib - A collection of libraries for developers building on the EVM * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2328989 python-ckzg - An implementation of the Polynomial Commitme

Re: libnova: announcing soname bump

2025-01-10 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 at 07:14, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:33:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:18:35PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:50, Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > > > > > If this is not

Re: libnova: announcing soname bump

2025-01-10 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:33:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:18:35PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:50, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > If this is not what 'proven packagers' are allowed to do, it might be > > > good to h

Re: libnova: announcing soname bump

2025-01-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 01:18:35PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 12:50, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM Stephen Smoogen > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Fabio Valentini > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 A

Re: libnova: announcing soname bump

2025-01-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 06:27:41PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 06/01/25 18:50, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM Mattia Verga via devel

glusterfs-coreutils: Intent to retire in Fedora 42

2025-01-10 Thread Anoop C S via devel
Hi, Following the announcement[1] on intention to retire main GlusterFS package from Fedora 42 I thought it wouldn't make sense to have glusterfs-coreutils package as it is heavily dependent on glusterfs. There is no active development effort in upstream[2] for glusterfs- coreutils. Therefore I i

Re: bin-sbin merge rebuild

2025-01-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > glibc > > If we rebuild glibc, should we do a second rebuild into your side tag? Probably… But let's coordinate (here or on Matrix). I hope we can avoid duplicate rebuilds. Zbyszek -- ___

Re: zswap: should we use zsmalloc as default allocator?

2025-01-10 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 09/01/2025 23:42, Chris Murphy wrote: Do I still need to enable zswap with the kernel param? Or can it all be done by the service unit? No. It will be enabled automatically since the zswap-cli.conf configuration file already has the enabled=Y option by default, and zswap can be enabled or

Re: bin-sbin merge rebuild

2025-01-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:31:18AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Jerry James wrote on 2025/01/10 8:10: > > For a little more fun the hivex package, which libguestfs depends on, > > is already in a side tag for a ruby update. I need to rebuild hivex > > and then libguestfs in the OCaml side tag, bu