Re[2]: security/nss/lib/nss/utilwrap.c and USE_UTIL_DIRECTLY

2009-10-02 Thread Konstantin Andreev
Thank you for explanation. Best regards, Konstantin Andreev Wan-Teh Chang wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Konstantin Andreev wrote: I have a couple of related questions. 1) If I am adding a function into the "util" library, should I care about placing a wrapper in the "utilwrap.c" ?

Re: security/nss/lib/nss/utilwrap.c and USE_UTIL_DIRECTLY

2009-10-01 Thread Wan-Teh Chang
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Konstantin Andreev wrote: > Hello. > > I have a couple of related questions. > > > 1) If I am adding a function into the "util" library, should I care about > placing a wrapper in the "utilwrap.c" ? No. New functions in the "util" library don't need a wrapper. The

security/nss/lib/nss/utilwrap.c and USE_UTIL_DIRECTLY

2009-10-01 Thread Konstantin Andreev
Hello. I have a couple of related questions. 1) If I am adding a function into the "util" library, should I care about placing a wrapper in the "utilwrap.c" ? 2) Is the USE_UTIL_DIRECTLY really just an option ? It looks like it couldn't be turned off, because "softokn" is using *_Util. Tur