D3|\||\|!$ wrote, On 2007-12-08 03:55:
[CRL question snipped. Kyle answered it.]
> 2) Consider the web page given below:
> http://docs.sun.com/source/816-5533-10/ext.htm#1012064
>
> It forewarns us to set the nonRepudiation (1) bit only after carefully
> considering their legal consequences. Sin
On Dec 8, 2007 3:55 AM, D3!$ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> 1)
> The RFC 2459 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2459.txt) mentions under
> heading 5.3.1 (Reason Code) that "CRL entry extension should be absent
> instead of using the unspecified (0) reasonCode value."
>
> Now, if its not m
2 matches
Mail list logo
