Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-21 Thread Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
timeless wrote: > Nelson: please trust us. the product has specific design constraints. > This is a public mailing list. Archived and published by Google Groups. Perhaps a different channel of communication would be better... > the purpose is to allow for mozilla to sit between e.g. MSIE or > A

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-21 Thread umesh
> Unfortunately umesh didn't explain exactly which path was taken. And > umesh didn't indicate if he used the NSS debug env vars to get extra > logging. Nor did umesh indicate if he had tried using ssltap in > conjunction with this, or using a mozilla as the client with it > configured w/ the NSS d

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-21 Thread timeless
I wish umesh would reply in thread instead of randomly posting new threads. *grumble* On Aug 19, 5:04 am, Nelson B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do you plan to defeat the MITM detection in the products you intend > to attack? Do you plan to plant a bogus root CA cert in them? > If so, how do y

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-21 Thread timeless
Nelson: please trust us. the product has specific design constraints. the purpose is to allow for mozilla to sit between e.g. MSIE or Acrobat Reader and a web server, analyze the stream and then do something based on it. The only way that this works is for MSIE or whatever to *install* a certific

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-18 Thread Nelson B
Umesh Bywar wrote: > [...] my goal is a little different. I want to intercept requests from > different clients (and not just the mozilla browser). So this compnent is > a real proxy listening on some port for requests. How do you plan to defeat the MITM detection in the products you intend to att

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-18 Thread Umesh Bywar
Hi Nelson: Thanks for your reply. But my goal is a little different. I want to intercept requests from different clients (and not just the mozilla browser). So this compnent is a real proxy listening on some port for requests. As far as the design is concerned, it may not be a good thin

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-16 Thread Nelson Bolyard
Colin Blake wrote: > The use of the word "extension" in Umesh's introduction is misleading. > This is for use within a product, which is not your typical browser with > a typical user. There is no plan to offer any such proxy as a general > purpose extension. If you want to perform some kind of fi

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-16 Thread Colin Blake
The use of the word "extension" in Umesh's introduction is misleading. This is for use within a product, which is not your typical browser with a typical user. There is no plan to offer any such proxy as a general purpose extension. Colin. ___ dev-tec

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-08 Thread Nelson B
Nelson B wrote: > Umesh Bywar wrote: > >> I am trying to write a man-in-the-middle proxy as an extension to >> mozilla. This proxy is basically supposed to intercept HTTP/HTTPS >> requests, parse them and forward them to the appropriate server. > > This is a profoundly bad idea. It has serious

Re: SSL in asynchronous proxy

2007-08-08 Thread Nelson B
Umesh Bywar wrote: > I am trying to write a man-in-the-middle proxy as an extension to > mozilla. This proxy is basically supposed to intercept HTTP/HTTPS > requests, parse them and forward them to the appropriate server. This is a profoundly bad idea. It has serious security vulnerability impl