On 11/19/2013 10:40 AM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
> Bob's answer is accurate.
>
> Note that CAs are more interested in SHA-2 based signature support
> rather than plain SHA-2 support. So another way to track down the NSS
> version is to look at the CVS history of the secvfy.c file:
>
> http://bonsai.moz
On 11/19/2013 02:50 AM, Rob Stradling wrote:
>> On 11/18/2013 07:00 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Following Microsoft's announcement re: SHA-1, some CAs are asking
>>> browser and OS vendors about the ubiquity of SHA-256 support. It would
>>> be a help to them if we could say:
On 11/18/2013 07:00 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Hi everyone,
Following Microsoft's announcement re: SHA-1, some CAs are asking
browser and OS vendors about the ubiquity of SHA-256 support. It would
be a help to them if we could say:
- Which version of NSS first supported SHA-256
Gerv, SHA-256
On 11/18/2013 07:00 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Following Microsoft's announcement re: SHA-1, some CAs are asking
> browser and OS vendors about the ubiquity of SHA-256 support. It would
> be a help to them if we could say:
>
> - Which version of NSS first supported SHA-256
I quic
SHA-256 was added in NSS 3.8 , according to :
http://www-archive.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/
On 11/18/2013 07:00, Gervase Markham wrote:
Hi everyone,
Following Microsoft's announcement re: SHA-1, some CAs are asking
browser and OS vendors about the ubiquity of SHA-256 support. It wo
5 matches
Mail list logo