RE: PKCS#11 header files: license and updating to the newest version

2010-08-03 Thread Brian Smith
Martin Paljak wrote: > FYI, OpenSC project [1] has a "fork" of the PKCS#11 headers [2]. Yes, I read the discussion about that and it also seems iffy. If Mozilla already has explicit permission to distribute them under the LGPL/GPL/MPL then that works much better. > At the same time, isn't GCM onl

Re: PKCS#11 header files: license and updating to the newest version

2010-08-03 Thread Martin Paljak
FYI, OpenSC project [1] has a "fork" of the PKCS#11 headers [2]. At the same time, isn't GCM only present in the latest 2.30 draft? [1] https://www.opensc-project.org/opensc [2] https://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/browser/trunk/src/pkcs11/pkcs11.h On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:10 PM, Brian Smith wro

Re: PKCS#11 header files: license and updating to the newest version

2010-08-02 Thread Wan-Teh Chang
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > I read a rumor that Mozilla received explicit permission from RSA labs to > distribute the PKCS#11 header files under the Mozilla tri-license. Does > anybody know anything about that, and how I can verify it? That's also what I heard. I don't