Re: Partitioned CRLs

2008-10-22 Thread Julien R Pierre - Sun Microsystems
Nuno, nponte wrote: Hi Julien, Thanks for your reply. Is there any ticket filed in bugzilla where I can track developments on this issue? Regards, Nuno Yes. See bugzilla 133191 . Also 321755 is related. ___ dev-tech-cr

Re: Partitioned CRLs

2008-10-22 Thread nponte
tificate 101 > > to 200 the CDP would behttp://myca.com/crl/myca-0002.crl, and so on. > > >     My question: Is Mozilla/NSS/PSM prepared to support partitioned > > CRLs like the way described? In particular, if CRLs are cached, they > > must be able to merge several different parti

Re: Partitioned CRLs

2008-10-20 Thread Julien R Pierre - Sun Microsystems
. My question: Is Mozilla/NSS/PSM prepared to support partitioned CRLs like the way described? In particular, if CRLs are cached, they must be able to merge several different partitions according to the CDP to create a unified view over the revocation universe of a CA. Regards, Nuno

Re: Partitioned CRLs

2008-10-20 Thread nponte
cate 1 to certificate 100, the > > CDP would behttp://myca.com/crl/myca-0001.crl, from certificate 101 > > to 200 the CDP would behttp://myca.com/crl/myca-0002.crl, and so on. > > >     My question: Is Mozilla/NSS/PSM prepared to support partitioned > > CRLs like the way d

Re: Partitioned CRLs

2008-10-17 Thread Nelson B Bolyard
CDP would be http://myca.com/crl/myca-0002.crl, and so on. > > My question: Is Mozilla/NSS/PSM prepared to support partitioned > CRLs like the way described? In particular, if CRLs are cached, they > must be able to merge several different partitions according to the > CDP to creat

Partitioned CRLs

2008-10-15 Thread nponte
/PSM prepared to support partitioned CRLs like the way described? In particular, if CRLs are cached, they must be able to merge several different partitions according to the CDP to create a unified view over the revocation universe of a CA. Regards, Nuno Ponte