Peter Djalaliev wrote:
> Can somebody elaborate a little more about why one is better then the
> other?
>
> I went to the VFY_VerifyDigest code and I saw in vfy_VerifyDigest
> that:
>
> - for signatures produced with the RSA encryption algorithm, it would
> decrypt the signature using the public k
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
> As I pointed out above, the PKCS #11 token also handles verifying
> RSA signatures. The only difference between the handling of RSA
> and DSA/ECDSA signatures is when we call PK11_xxx and whether
> we call PK11_VerifyRecover or PK11_Verify. (PK11_VerifyRecover
> doesn't ma
On 27 Mar 2007 19:43:13 -0700, Peter Djalaliev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I had a problem with verifying a RSA signtaure, I was hinted by
> Bob Releya that the VFY_* functions are better to use than PK11_Verify
> when trying to verify a signature given the digest of what was
> act
Hello,
When I had a problem with verifying a RSA signtaure, I was hinted by
Bob Releya that the VFY_* functions are better to use than PK11_Verify
when trying to verify a signature given the digest of what was
actually signed.
I was intrigued by that (it helped solve a related problem I had), so
4 matches
Mail list logo
