Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> Kaspar Brand wrote, On 2008-10-18 00:18:
>> Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>
>>> Yes. Bad response, ugly errors, no fun.
>> With the default settings in Firefox 3, it isn't that bad... remember
>> that it's the "graceful failure" mode which is selected by default:
>>
>
> Don't
Kaspar Brand wrote, On 2008-10-18 00:18:
> Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>> Yes. Bad response, ugly errors, no fun.
>
> With the default settings in Firefox 3, it isn't that bad... remember
> that it's the "graceful failure" mode which is selected by default:
>
Don't forget the OCSP checks done in c
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> Frank Hecker wrote, On 2008-10-17 06:57:
>
>> Please refresh my memory here: As I understand it, the basic problem was
>> that if the Microsec root were included in Firefox (or other products)
>> and a user surfed to an SSL/TLS-enabled site with an end entity
>> certif
On Thursday 02 October 2008 22:43:02 Frank Hecker wrote:
> * Microsec has a separate root used for OCSP, and apparently does not
> offer OCSP as a general public service; please see the comments in the
> bug. I'd like those of you who are OCSP experts to look at this issue
> and tell us if you see
Frank Hecker wrote:
> I am now opening the first public discussion period for a request from
> Microtec Ltd to add the Microsec e-Szigno Root CA root certificate to
D'oh! It's "Microsec", *not* "Microtec". I got it right everywhere
except for the subject line and the first sentence. Sigh...
Fr
5 matches
Mail list logo
