Sorry, I didn't get time to respond to your message yesterday.
Will there be a cutoff for when Mozilla requires audits against the
final guidelines instead of allowing draft guidelines?
--Paul Hoffman
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@li
Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Will there be a cutoff for when Mozilla requires audits against the
> final guidelines instead of allowing draft guidelines?
Yes, per the revised policy the cutoff date is June 30.
Frank
--
Frank Hecker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
dev
/projects/security/certs/policy/
Thanks to those of you who provided comments.
Starting from now I will consider approval of CA EV requests based on
the draft EV guidelines and criteria.
Frank
--
Frank Hecker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
dev-
When we updated the Mozilla CA certificate policy (to revision 1.1) to
accommodate requests related to Extended Validation (EV) certificates,
we specified use of the 1.0 EV guidelines from the CAB Forum and the 1.0
EV criteria from WebTrust. As it happens, because of the relatively
recent
green bars and cute pad-locks is just
"chrome" that means close to nothing for most people.
Anders R
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Bucksch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.security,mozilla.dev.tech.crypto
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2
delines, and they'll automate
as much as possible.
Also, there are really heavy statements in there, e.g. the liability
(37(a); see also
<https://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/000862.html>: If the CA
followes the EV guidelines and the user gets ripped off, the CA is not
6 matches
Mail list logo
