Frank Hecker schrieb:
> Second, in the case of T-Systems the issue seems to be that T-Systems
> functions primarily as a root CA, not as a CA issuing end-entity
> certificates. Therefore the T-Systems CPS does not address practices
> relating to issuance of end-entity certificates.
> The solu
rainer_k wrote:
> If this is such a serious concern, why did Microsoft decicde to put
> this CA inside the Windows
> CA store and even distribute this via automatic update?
I don't think "but Microsoft did it" is, in general, a convincing
argument when it comes to good security practice.
> The
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Eddy,
>
> we (T-Systems) appreciate your input, even if we don't agree with all
> of your statements. We strongly encourage you to give further feedback
> until the end of the first week. We know that you do this in your
> spare time to support Mozilla, but changing the CP and
rainer_k wrote:
> If this is such a serious concern, why did Microsoft decicde to put
> this CA inside the Windows
> CA store and even distribute this via automatic update?
> Installment of the Telekom CA into Firefox and putting more
> restrictive policies for CAs into action in general
> are two
Eddy,
we (T-Systems) appreciate your input, even if we don't agree with all
of your statements. We strongly encourage you to give further feedback
until the end of the first week. We know that you do this in your
spare time to support Mozilla, but changing the CP and CPS is a
serious act and shoul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Eddy, Frank,
>
> See the comments of T-Systems (WP as an Acronym of my Name Wolfgang
> Pietrus) in the text below.
Hallo Wolfgang,
Vielen Dank fuer Ihre Antwort :-)
>>
>> Nevertheless I read mostly the English version which is easier to
>> understand. Similar to Kathleen's
rainer_k:
> Eddy,
>
> If this is such a serious concern, why did Microsoft decicde to put
> this CA inside the Windows
> CA store and even distribute this via automatic update?
> Installment of the Telekom CA into Firefox and putting more
> restrictive policies for CAs into action in general
> are
Eddy,
If this is such a serious concern, why did Microsoft decicde to put
this CA inside the Windows
CA store and even distribute this via automatic update?
Installment of the Telekom CA into Firefox and putting more
restrictive policies for CAs into action in general
are two different topics and
Eddy, Frank,
See the comments of T-Systems (WP as an Acronym of my Name Wolfgang
Pietrus) in the text below.
On Jul 20, 1:37 am, Eddy Nigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started to review this inclusion request by reading parts of the
> German version of the CP and CPS, which I understand is the
I started to review this inclusion request by reading parts of the
German version of the CP and CPS, which I understand is the only legal
document. The English version seems to be a draft only and perhaps not
legally binding.
Nevertheless I read mostly the English version which is easier to
un
As I previously mentioned, I am now opening the first public discussion
period for a request from T-Systems (a subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom)
to add the Deutsche Telekom Root CA 2 root certificate to Mozilla. This
is bug 378882, and Kathleen has produced an information document
attached to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
