Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2011-06-21 11:18, Konstantin Andreev wrote: > [combining two cites to save space] > > On 21.06.11 00:48, Anders Rundgren wrote: >> >> We have both come to the conclusion that Firefox et al sucks since just >> about all serious users need to deploy plugins in order to use their PKIs. > > On 18

Re[11]: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-21 Thread Konstantin Andreev
[combining two cites to save space] On 21.06.11 00:48, Anders Rundgren wrote: We have both come to the conclusion that Firefox et al sucks since just about all serious users need to deploy plugins in order to use their PKIs. On 18.06.11 19:59, Anders Rundgren wrote: [Subject: Update: Brows

Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-20 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2011-06-20 09:29, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Anders Rundgren wrote: >>> The webcrypto-api proposal is oriented around certificate/X509/smartcard PKI, I end up with the feeling the two proposal lives in different realms. >> http://html5.creation.net/webcrypto-api >> >> Thanx J-M, I wasn

Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-20 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
Anders Rundgren wrote: The webcrypto-api proposal is oriented around certificate/X509/smartcard > PKI, I end up with the feeling the two proposal lives in different realms. http://html5.creation.net/webcrypto-api Thanx J-M, I wasn't aware of this one. H**y c**p! Somebody is actually doing s

Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-17 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2011-06-17 15:31, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > David Dahl wrote: >>> I find this API effort very interesting, however I'm left with the feeling you wish to leave out the use of PKI elements. A really neutral API would work both with and without PKI. >> Public Key crypto is actually

Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-17 Thread David Dahl
- Original Message - > From: "Jean-Marc Desperrier" > To: mozilla-dev-tech-cry...@lists.mozilla.org > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:31:03 AM > Subject: Re: DOMCrypt API developments > David Dahl wrote: > >> I find this API effort very interesting, however

Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-17 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
David Dahl wrote: I find this API effort very interesting, however I'm left with the > feeling you wish to leave out the use of PKI elements. > A really neutral API would work both with and without PKI. Public Key crypto is actually the main use case of this API. I meant more certificate/X50

Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-15 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2011-06-14 16:48, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > David Dahl wrote: >> From: "L. David Baron" >> On Monday 2011-06-13 15:31 -0700, David Dahl wrote: In trying to get the word out about a browser crypto API I am championing (see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Features/DOMCryp

Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-14 Thread David Dahl
- Original Message - > From: "Jean-Marc Desperrier" > To: mozilla-dev-tech-cry...@lists.mozilla.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 9:48:40 AM > Subject: Re: DOMCrypt API developments > However you did not post this to the obvious choice of > mozilla.dev.t

Re: DOMCrypt API developments

2011-06-14 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
David Dahl wrote: From: "L. David Baron" On Monday 2011-06-13 15:31 -0700, David Dahl wrote: In trying to get the word out about a browser crypto API I am championing (see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Features/DOMCryptAPISpec/Latest ), I wanted to post here for feedback and criticism.