for my software (which uses gcc
for compilation).
Best Regards,
Weizhong Qiang
On Sep 15, 2012, at 4:34 AM, wdeng wrote:
> Did you configure the building system yourself?
> Usually I build firefox on windows with the MozillaBuild tool which can be
> got at:
> http://ftp.moz
hi,
Thanks for your help.
For the two different patches, your patch still gets the same error; the other
patch gets better result(nspr compilation passed), but another error appears
("cl: command not found"), I don't know why the the compilation before this
error uses gcc to compile, but why he
illa/security/nss. I have tried the different versions
of MinGW as well as the versions of nss source, but still all can not get
compiled.
The following is the log.
Thanks a lot for your instruction.
Best Regards,
Weizhong Qiang
gcc -mwindows -o prtpd.o -c -g
hi,
I solved the problem by generating the key pair with "isPerm" to be PR_FALSE,
and then importing the private key using
PK11_ImportDERPrivateKeyInfoAndReturnKey.
Best Regards,
Weizhong Qiang
On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:28 AM, weizhong qiang wrote:
> hi Robert and others,
> Se
, then not mater the "IsSensitive"
(the next parameter after "isPerm") is PR_TRUE or PR_FALSE, the private key
always sensitive.
Is it a feature?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Weizhong Qiang
On Jan 28, 2012, at 4:16 PM, weizhong qiang wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 6:5
hi,
On Jan 27, 2012, at 6:52 PM, Robert Relyea wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 11:53 PM, weizhong qiang wrote:
>> hi,
>> I did found that the CKA_SENSITIVE is "true" by using the following code:
>> rv = PK11_ReadRawAttribute(PK11_TypePrivKey, privKey,
>> CKA
hi,
On Jan 27, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Robert Relyea wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 06:50 PM, weizhong qiang wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Robert Relyea wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/26/2012 05:08 AM, weizhong qiang wrote:
>>>> hi,
>>>>
e from
private key.");
}
if ((value.len == 1) && (value.data != NULL))
std::cout<< !!(*(CK_BBOOL*)value.data)< On 01/26/2012 07:55 AM, weizhong qiang wrote:
>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:44 PM, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
>>
>>> AFAIK, return
hi,
On Jan 26, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Robert Relyea wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 05:08 AM, weizhong qiang wrote:
>> hi,
>> Is there a fact that nss does not permit the reading of the attribute
>> CKA_PRIVATE_EXPONENT, CKA_PRIME_1, etc.?
>> Because with all of the eight at
at can be happening.
> For example if token=card, CKA_PRIME_1 *musnt* be on the card, as far
> is not *needed* to do cryptographic operations.
>
> El día 26 de enero de 2012 14:08, weizhong qiang
> escribió:
>> hi,
>> Is there a fact that nss does not
Regards,
Weizhong Qiang
On Jan 26, 2012, at 9:43 AM, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
> Is eny error shown at NSSUtilLogger.msg(ERROR, "Failed to read
> attribute %x from private key.", type); ?
>
> El día 25 de enero de 2012 17:04, weizhong qiang
> escribió:
>> hi all,
&
The rv value gives SECFailure.
Thanks
在 2012-1-26 下午5:29，"helpcrypto helpcrypto" 写道：
> my mistake. i mean the RV value
> --
> dev-tech-crypto mailing list
> dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
>
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@li
Hi,
It gives number 123, which is the type CKA_PRIVATE_EXPONENT.
Thanks
Weizhong qiang
在 2012-1-26 下午4:43，"helpcrypto helpcrypto" 写道：
> Is eny error shown at NSSUtilLogger.msg(ERROR, "Failed to read
> attribute %x from private key.", type); ?
>
> El día 25 de ene
itive"
(PK11_GenerateKeyPair(slot, CKM_RSA_PKCS_KEY_PAIR_GEN, &rsaParams, pubk,
PR_TRUE, PR_FALSE, NULL); ), so I suppose the private key is not protected by
password, and can be output?
Best Regards,
Weizhong Qiang
//
static bool ReadPrivKeyAttribute(SECKEYP
14 matches
Mail list logo
