On Dec 31 2008, 12:28 am, "Kyle Hamilton" wrote:
> (note: "unknown_issuer" without talking at all about who the issuer
> claims to be
you're missing a critical point:
the issuer is something about which we know nothing.
someone could claim "issuer: GOD" or "issuer: POTUS" or "issuer:
VeriSign".
On Dec 25 2008, 12:36 am, "Kyle Hamilton" wrote:
> To be honest, Mozilla doesn't distribute keytool with Firefox, which
> means that I have to try to go into the
> (unbatchable) interface
this is false.
the ui is built as xul with js bindings to c++ objects which use idl
to expose methods. the j
I wish umesh would reply in thread instead of randomly posting new
threads. *grumble*
On Aug 19, 5:04 am, Nelson B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you plan to defeat the MITM detection in the products you intend
> to attack? Do you plan to plant a bogus root CA cert in them?
> If so, how do y
Nelson: please trust us. the product has specific design constraints.
the purpose is to allow for mozilla to sit between e.g. MSIE or
Acrobat Reader and a web server, analyze the stream and then do
something based on it.
The only way that this works is for MSIE or whatever to *install* a
certific
On Mar 14, 1:18 pm, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new proposed draft is here:http://wiki.mozilla.org/Contributor_Form
>
> I am drawing this to the attention of the Mozilla cryptography community
> especially, because the document contains a section (Section 5) which
> explicitly
On Feb 28, 3:53 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Timeless: Is this what you mean? I write JS code for the GUI bit. So I
> have a box with a username and password prompt and a "GO" button. So
> now JS has no Sftp(SSH) support so it has to get it from somewhere
> else.
>
>
On Mar 1, 8:50 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The next thing now is to make Mozilla somehow understand that it has
> to just try and call this C++ code. No SFTP functionality will be
> written here. As soon as the user enters "username" and "password" and
> hits "GO" the entire C++ code is called a
On Feb 24, 7:07 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am brand new to writing extensions for Firefox. I was looking at
> FireFTP and it looked like it didnt have support for Sftp. So I
> thought I would try and write one.
> I did go through quite a few pages on "How to write extensions". My
> question th
On Feb 7, 10:43 pm, Ben Bucksch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, you know bugzilla, right? File a bug.
in this case, there's no need for a bug.
bugzilla is run by the same admins who would run the script required
to correct mxr.
unfortunately, the admin needs to spend time on bugzilla (it needs
Jim Spring wrote:
> I've checked the PKCS11 FAQ and it doesn't list all of them,
> so I was curious if there is a definitive list of the hard
> coded mechanisms that Firefox (and Thunderbird) use? For
> instance, KeyGen uses CKM_RSA_PKCS. I'm looking for a short
> cut to trudging through the sour
> To create a patch, you should always use the "cvs diff -u" command, IMO.
cvs diff -up is better :)
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
11 matches
Mail list logo
