On Mar 22, 11:34 pm, Robert Relyea wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 03:09 PM, silent...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Thank you for the reply!
>
> > On Mar 22, 7:00 pm, Robert Relyea wrote:
> >> Unless there is an authoritative way to bind the cert t
Thank you for the reply!
On Mar 22, 7:00 pm, Robert Relyea wrote:
> Unless there is an authoritative way to bind the cert to a given email
> address, there is no way to use those certs for email. If you want email
> certs to interoperate with people from outside of the infrastructure,
> the only
able to support encryption or having an option
that enables or disables verification of email addresses in
certificates would make sense.
Best regards,
Sergei Evdokimov
On Mar 21, 5:54 am, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> On 2011/03/17 02:41 PDT, silent...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > It seems that T
It seems that Thunderbird refuses to use X.509 certificates for S/MIME
encryption when these certificates do not contain email address of the
subject. We want to use S/MIME with keys stored on smart cards and
certificates distributed via LDAP. For obvious reasons we cannot
attach certificates to fi
4 matches
Mail list logo
