Other recommended reading when discussing this:
https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/5118/is-aes-256-weaker-than-192-and-128-bit-versions
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/crypto/comments/39211m/is_really_aes256_less_secure_than_ae
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:40:45 +0200
Kai Engert wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 20:51 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> > Do you claim that Firefox 34 will continue to fall back to SSL 3 when
> > necessary?
>
> Yes. If I understand correctly, it seems that Firefox indeed still falls
> back to SSL3, even w
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:27:24 +0200
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard Barnes:
>
> > If there are any objections or comments on that proposal, please
> > raise them in this thread.
>
> A lot of this has already been hashed out on the IETF TLS WG mailing
> list, with a slightly different perspecti
I'm sure the NSS and NSPR developers would love to review them.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Getting_your_patch_in_the_tree has
some good information on how to get your patch landed. Let us know if
you have any questions.
Thanks again for your contribution!
~reed
[0] https://bugzilla.m
27;t that hard.
I filed this as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556468 for
(any) investigation tracking.
~reed
--
Reed Loden -
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
SS to establish a TLS connection for authentication
purposes, this allows a local attacker to enable features which make
it easier to impersonate the authentication server.
I couldn't find any programs which might suffer from such a problem,
though.
--
Reed Loden -
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing lis
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:22:35 -0600
Reed Loden wrote:
> I've filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479949 to track this
> issue, ...
Apparently, I didn't notice https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425122
when filing, so I've duped the above bug t
on (or at least a stop-gap) to
this very annoying problem, as we know it affects the ability to just get work
done.
Thanks for your patience in this matter.
~reed, wearing my Mozilla SysAdmin hat
--
Reed Loden -
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists
icate for *.mozilla.org?
The O= is currently Mozilla Corporation, rather than Mozilla Foundation.
~reed
--
Reed Loden -
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:13:53 +0200
Eddy Nigg wrote:
> On 12/28/2008 09:45 PM, Reed Loden:
> >
> > You can use any e-mail address as a Google Account, so yes, I
> > really think so. Patricia's reply confirms this, too.
> >
>
> Reed, Servage is a hosting
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:47:49 +0100
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Reed Loden wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:55:45 +0100
> > Michael Ströder wrote:
> >
> >> 3. Strange from address with another famous trademark as local part
> >> used in another posting h
ubmitting to the newsgroups via Google
Groups, and I bet her google account is the address used in the post
to which you're referring. She probably just forgot to change it to
her work address before sending. I wouldn't fault her or her company for
this "mistake" in any way.
~r
12 matches
Mail list logo
