On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:15:51AM -0500, John Dennis wrote:
> On 01/19/2012 07:26 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >He is talking about runtime detection. Not build time detection. And we
> >already have --with-system-nss. My point is that it's probably not worth
> >trying to do
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:52:26AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Brian Smith wrote:
> > Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> But linux users are not necessarily up-to-date with the latest NSS. I
> >> seriously doubt the number of users with the very l
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:45:02PM -0800, Brian Smith wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > In the long run, for performance reasons, we should probably prefer
> > > the system NSS libraries to our own, whenever the system NSS
> > > libraries are available and are
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:44:34PM -0800, Brian Smith wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Please note that this is going to be a problem on systems that have
> > system nspr and nss libraries that other system libraries use.
>
> I am intending to avoid changing how NSS is linked
4 matches
Mail list logo
