Re: The element

2009-06-03 Thread Ian Hickson
han six > message rounds compared to 's three. Take a peek at the [beta] > XML Schema at: http://keycenter.webpki.org/resources in case you are > interested Thanks for the info! On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Anders Rundgren wrote: > > I understand what you are saying,

Re: [whatwg] The element

2009-04-07 Thread Ian Hickson
e names > like dsaparams="" makes sense. But on the other, allowing params with > arbitrary names seems like a more flexible approach. Why would it be more flexible to use another element? Surely attributes are just as flexible. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E

The element

2009-04-06 Thread Ian Hickson
; de facto standard and is now supported in numerous packages. It's not non-standard any more, I guess! > b) The tag has no way to specify whether the key is to be used for > signing-only, or whether it can also be used for data/key encryption. > c) The SPKAC format requires that