> On Mon, May 4, 2015 1:25 pm, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> Surely that's not unique? Using the above example, surely the first
>> certificate issued by the 2010 instance of 'My CA', and the first
>> certificate issued by the 2015 instance, are both going to have
>> identical CKA_ISSUER and CKA_S
On Mon, May 4, 2015 1:25 pm, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Surely that's not unique? Using the above example, surely the first
> certificate issued by the 2010 instance of 'My CA', and the first
> certificate issued by the 2015 instance, are both going to have
> identical CKA_ISSUER and CKA_SERIAL_N
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 09:21 -0700, Robert Relyea wrote:
> So in NSS, CKA_LABEL is simply a short cut to CKA_SUBJECT. That is NSS
> looks up a cert from the nickname and picks all the certs that match
> that cert's subject.
Hm... so if I have two certificates; one with:
CKA_SUBJECT: "My CA"
C
On 05/04/2015 10:09 AM, Brian Smith wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Tanvi Vyas wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Michael Peterson <
michaelpeterson...@gmail.com> wrote:
Now, in the album I posted above (https://imgur.com/a/dmMdG), the last
two screenshots show a packet capture from
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Tanvi Vyas wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Michael Peterson <
> michaelpeterson...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now, in the album I posted above (https://imgur.com/a/dmMdG), the last
> two screenshots show a packet capture from Wireshark. It appears that
> Firefox
On 05/03/2015 02:17 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 18:33 -0700, Jan Pechanec wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2015, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:35 +0100, Alan Braggins wrote:
On 30/04/15 17:56, David Woodhouse wrote:
Has anyone looked at implementing RFC7512 support
On Friday 01 May 2015 12:11:00 Tanvi Vyas wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Michael Peterson
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Firefox does not like our internal certificates. I'm trying to figure out
> > why...>
> >
> >
> > tl;dr - Our internal IIS servers, signed with our internal CA, present a
> > "
Posting to mozilla-dev-tech-crypto instead. firefox-dev to bcc.
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Michael Peterson
> wrote:
>
> Firefox does not like our internal certificates. I'm trying to figure out
> why...
>
> tl;dr - Our internal IIS servers, signed with our internal CA, present a
> "S
On Fri, 1 May 2015, David Woodhouse wrote:
>On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:35 +0100, Alan Braggins wrote:
>> On 30/04/15 17:56, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> > Has anyone looked at implementing RFC7512 support, allowing an object
>> > to be specified by a PKCS#11 URI?
>> I don't suppose you know why RFC 751
9 matches
Mail list logo
